Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

New Rivals Top 250 Updated

Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:03 pm
Posted by Tiger Phanatick
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2008
4103 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:03 pm
Looks like we took a beating today after so many wins yesterday.

Gilmore, Diarse, Brazil and Jefferson still in top 250 but they all dropped.

Boutte at 116.

I still feel great about this class.

A little dissppointed that rivals didnt give us the proper love. Although I do agree that Diarse wasnt a world beater in the USAAA game and Brazil got beat for a TD in the UAAA.

Rivals Top 250

ETA: Jennings at 145
This post was edited on 1/22/13 at 2:05 pm
Posted by DaveDog
Member since Nov 2009
536 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

New Rivals Top 250 Updated



Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Although I do agree that Diarse wasnt a world beater in the USAAA game


Actually he was considered one of the best there. Some of the best hands and ability, but bad route running, still better than most others. Kinda surprised he dropped
This post was edited on 1/22/13 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Tiger Phanatick
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2008
4103 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:09 pm to
I am not reffering to practice week. I am talking about the actuall game on Sat.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32383 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:11 pm to
Had to drop our guys, to make room for bama's guys to all leap into the top 50.
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:12 pm to
True, but barely any of the receivers made a big impact. Diarse did have a nice throw though
Posted by LSUTil_iDie
Lawrenceville, GA
Member since Jan 2012
5511 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

but bad route running


Really? I thought I read a practice report that said he looked like the most natural receiver out there.
Posted by LsuTool
Member since Oct 2009
34842 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:12 pm to
rivals said Diarse was better than they thought in a some practice reports that I read.

Why say that, then drop him down even further?
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 2:29 pm to
Should have said raw, not bad. By natural receiver I think they meant his catching ability, vision
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram