Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Banning people

Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:57 am
Posted by karralum
southeastern conference territory
Member since Apr 2012
1138 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:57 am
If someone is trying to get someone ban for accusing them of being an alter. Then the person doing the accusing, should be banned for x amount of time if their accusations are inaccurate.
It seems now people will assume you are an alter just for disagreeing with them.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68268 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 12:24 pm to
Shut up.

Ra'd for obvious alter
Posted by Maniac979
The Great State of Texas
Member since Jan 2012
1904 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 12:34 pm to
go back to your safe space and melt snowFlake
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

If someone is trying to get someone ban for accusing them of being an alter. Then the person doing the accusing, should be banned for x amount of time if their accusations are inaccurate.



Well seems like it is accurate:

quote:

Same people who suggested Grayson was the heir apparent and i was like you can't be serious.


-karralum


Zero posts about Grayson and zero posts on Saints talk while he was on the team


DERP
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 3:52 pm to
no
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58309 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 12:11 am to
Against calling out people to be banned.


Wants those calling for bans banned.
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
19999 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 10:24 pm to
Sounds like something an alter would say.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram