- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
COD IW campaign is shite on PC
Posted on 11/6/16 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 11/6/16 at 6:49 pm
I know I am one of the few that play it but when you are floating around in space it's easy to lose your mission marker and the you don't know where the frick to go. The directional keys will sometimes not work like when you are holding down the left key it will not move you left.
The story is good and looks to not be an 8 hour completion and Naughty Dog helped withe the campaign.
The story is good and looks to not be an 8 hour completion and Naughty Dog helped withe the campaign.
3
Posted on 11/6/16 at 6:51 pm to DoUrden
quote:
The story is good and looks to not be an 8 hour completion and Naughty Dog helped withe the campaign.
lol wat
Yeah, I want to play Infinite Warfare for the campaign alone. Thinking of redboxing it.
It's a shame how poorly received the PC port for Infinite Warfare has been received. Call of Duty started as a PC franchise.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 7:01 pm to DoUrden
I don't think naughty dog helped. I think they just hired a couple of writers.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 7:06 pm to DoUrden
quote:
COD is shite
Fixed it for you.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 7:14 pm to Mr Gardoki
quote:
I don't think naughty dog helped.
The community manger for Infinity Ward on the race stream confirmed that they helped.
This post was edited on 11/6/16 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 11/6/16 at 7:58 pm to DoUrden
You won't win this argument. If you're right.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:00 pm to DoUrden
Hadn't heard that. I just remember them hiring someone. I wonder what helped means.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:03 pm to Mr Gardoki
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:04 pm to DoUrden
That looks like the hires I remember.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:15 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
Fixed it for you.
Was about to come post the same thing
Still pissed they are making people pay $80 to have access to the MW remaster.
Even they know their games are total garbage, so they package it with MW to sell it. frick them.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:42 pm to dcrews
They've just ran CoD into the ground. It's not exactly like Ubisoft and Assassin's Creed. Assassin's Creed's gameplay has always needed improvement in a lot of areas and you have the last gen and current gen games feeling very distinct from one another.
With Call of Duty, they perfected the formula 11 years ago with Call of Duty 2, and I'm not sure just how radically they can change the game and it still be considered Call of Duty. Some minor tweaks here and there is just about all you've seen out of Gears of War and Halo but those games don't release like Madden sports titles every year. I don't think Call of Duty would be as hated as it is if they would release every 2 to 3 years instead of on a yearly basis.
With Call of Duty, they perfected the formula 11 years ago with Call of Duty 2, and I'm not sure just how radically they can change the game and it still be considered Call of Duty. Some minor tweaks here and there is just about all you've seen out of Gears of War and Halo but those games don't release like Madden sports titles every year. I don't think Call of Duty would be as hated as it is if they would release every 2 to 3 years instead of on a yearly basis.
Posted on 11/6/16 at 8:49 pm to BulldogXero
quote:
I don't think Call of Duty would be as hated as it is if they would release every 2 to 3 years instead of on a yearly basis.
Probably true.
Admittedly I absolutely detest the futuristic warfare type stuff, especially the boosting and wall running.
After the first Modern Warfare, I didn't purchase another COD until the most recent one before this newest one. I played it for 2 weeks to give it a chance and I immediately uninstalled. It was dreadful.
Outside of the first MW, my most favorite FPS was Battlefield Bad Company 2: Vietnam. I'd still be playing except they shut down their servers.
I'd really like to see CoD go the way of Vietnam or back to WWII.
I'd gladly pay $20-$30 for MW remastered by itself.
This post was edited on 11/6/16 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 11/7/16 at 8:23 am to dcrews
quote:
I'd gladly pay $20-$30 for MW remastered by itself.
This.
I spent the money only to get COD4 MW remastered. I refuse to install or try IW because I'v seen game play and know I'll only get triggered by it. If I want futuristic stuff there are games out there I'd play over this anyway.
IMO right now MW remastered still needs some work but while playing it it made me want to get back into FPS play. So I bought BF1. After a few hours on BF1 I'm considering returning COD although i wish i could keep MW and wait to see if they push a few updates.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News