- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Civ 6 officially announced!!!! (October 21, 2016)
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:19 am
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:19 am
LINK
Announcement Trailer **WARNING: MAY INDUCE BONER**
Article
Announcement Trailer **WARNING: MAY INDUCE BONER**
Article
quote:
Civilization VI offers new ways to interact with your world, expand your empire across the map, advance your culture, and compete against history’s greatest leaders to build a civilization that will stand the test of time.
Originally created by legendary game designer Sid Meier, Civilization is a turn-based strategy game in which you attempt to build an empire to stand the test of time. Become Ruler of the World by establishing and leading a civilization from the Stone Age to the Information Age. Wage war, conduct diplomacy, advance your culture, and go head-to-head with history’s greatest leaders as you attempt to build the greatest civilization the world has ever known.
quote:
The game is set to hit PC on October 21, 2016.
This post was edited on 5/11/16 at 10:24 am
8
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:22 am to Roaad
I was quite excited initially, until I saw the art style of the game. It looks like Clash of Clans...
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:24 am to Cs
wtf
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:27 am to Cs
Ouch.
Hopefully the shorted graphics mean more effort in other area, then I could forgive.
But shouldn't devs learn from the Tony Hawk disaster?
We don't like WoW graphics.
Hopefully the shorted graphics mean more effort in other area, then I could forgive.
But shouldn't devs learn from the Tony Hawk disaster?
We don't like WoW graphics.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:31 am to Roaad
Art style wasn't the problem with tony hawk 
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:32 am to Roaad
I'm concerned the game is going to be diluted of all complexity for the sake of accessibility.
Firaxis said point blank in the press release they're eager to bring in new fans. If they're willing to change the art style of the game to mimic some F2P knock off from the app store, what else are they willing to alter?
Firaxis said point blank in the press release they're eager to bring in new fans. If they're willing to change the art style of the game to mimic some F2P knock off from the app store, what else are they willing to alter?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:35 am to Cs
Chances that this game won't be worth buying until they release 4 or 5 expansions running the total bill up close to $120?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 10:38 am to Mr Gardoki
quote:
Art style wasn't the problem with tony hawk
I actually liked the art style. The biggest problem now is the unoriginal goals they copy/pasted into every level and how over half the official levels feel like they could've been created in the park editor.
Framerate is better and it's a lot less buggy. I got it for $25. For that price, I was satisfied. Certainly not worth $60.
That said, that screenshot makes me think Civ 6 is going to be released in mobile devices.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 11:24 am to Roaad
And my life is over
Posted on 5/11/16 at 11:35 am to Roaad
Happy to see new Civ on the horizon but I still want a new civilization revolution for the current gen console. I played the ever living shite out of Civ Rev on my old 360.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 11:55 am to Roaad
Looks a lot like Civilization Revolution from the 360. Hope it's not anything like that
Posted on 5/11/16 at 1:34 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Polygon article with game details.
Reddit is kinda pissed about the art design, but who cares, honestly. Better graphics never means better game, especially not in a frikkin RTS
Reddit is kinda pissed about the art design, but who cares, honestly. Better graphics never means better game, especially not in a frikkin RTS
Posted on 5/11/16 at 2:41 pm to Roaad
Can someone explain what happened during the most recent Civilization release dealing with EA?
Posted on 5/11/16 at 2:44 pm to Gusoline
I'm with you on this. Graphics look fine, I'm more worried about shitty AI
Posted on 5/11/16 at 3:11 pm to Gusoline
quote:
Civilization 6 is not the same. It demands that you place your city improvements in geographic locations in hexes around the city, which best take advantage of that building's boosts and functions.
IOW they robbed from Warlock 2
Posted on 5/11/16 at 3:12 pm to Roaad
Will wait to buy
Posted on 5/11/16 at 4:07 pm to Cs
quote:
Firaxis said point blank in the press release they're eager to bring in new fans.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 4:38 pm to geauxtigers87
I'll probably continue to play Civ V for a long time considering how shitty it was initially. Now years later it's the best it's ever been. Not sure how I feel about the graphis. I'm sure the pictures posted are of a close zoom, but I kind of liked the simplicity of the graphics.
Posted on 5/11/16 at 6:14 pm to J Murdah
I just bought the complete edition of civ v for under 15 bucks.
Looks a whole lot better than this one. Just curb stomped a city state heavy lake map with Poland
Looks a whole lot better than this one. Just curb stomped a city state heavy lake map with Poland
Posted on 5/11/16 at 6:39 pm to J Murdah
I'm honestly surprised how little flak Firaxis has taken for the shoddy state of both Civ V and BE on release. Both required multiple expansion before they were "good."
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News