- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would it be crazy to not take a RB in my first 2 picks??**update**
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:14 am
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:14 am
I am picking 8th in a 10 man league.
In our league, QB's get 6 points a TD, and 1 point for every 20 yards. Obviously, QB go a little higher in this draft.
I am very high on Gronk. If I took him with my first pick, and either Rogers or Luck was there for my second pick (or vice versa), would it be really crazy to not take a CJ Anderson or Hill right there....and just wait till the 3rd and 4th round???
I keep going back and fourth on this one.
**Update**.... Took Gronk with 1st pick in the draft. And happy I did!!
In our league, QB's get 6 points a TD, and 1 point for every 20 yards. Obviously, QB go a little higher in this draft.
I am very high on Gronk. If I took him with my first pick, and either Rogers or Luck was there for my second pick (or vice versa), would it be really crazy to not take a CJ Anderson or Hill right there....and just wait till the 3rd and 4th round???
I keep going back and fourth on this one.
**Update**.... Took Gronk with 1st pick in the draft. And happy I did!!
This post was edited on 9/10/15 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:24 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
quote:
I am very high on Gronk
Absolutely not.
If you make that pick make it being fully aware that Gronk is not a top 5 receiving target.
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 9:25 am
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:27 am to Goldrush25
Not a PPR league.
Yea, a Bryant pick maybe better there.
Yea, a Bryant pick maybe better there.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:34 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
No it's not crazy. RB's are the first to get hurt. The NFL is a passing league now. Most teams run two RB systems.
CJ Anderson could be this season's Zac Stacy. Always be weary of the RB who did really well at the end of the season.
There will be another CJ Anderson/Zac Stacy pick up later this year. Pick that RB up and make the playoffs.
CJ Anderson could be this season's Zac Stacy. Always be weary of the RB who did really well at the end of the season.
There will be another CJ Anderson/Zac Stacy pick up later this year. Pick that RB up and make the playoffs.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:43 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
Personally, I would probably go with D. Thomas or Odell then grab Luck if available in the 2nd, followed by the 2 best available RB picks(L.Miller type), then snag someone like Amari or Edleman in the 5th. Of course, if a real value pick falls to you, then you gotta jump on it.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:47 am to ATLsuTiger
In many 12 man mocks, I got OBJ and Dez, then picked up Carlos Hyde/Joesph Randle/Melvin Gordon my next 2 picks. Followed by a solid TE and a flex player. So no, you don't need a RB in the first two rounds
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:56 am to LSUChamp06
That's exactly how I feel!... RB's get hurt the most, so if I play the draft or waiver wire right, I can snag a good flex. And outside of the top 3 or 4, they all split carries now.
So why not grab the #1 TE (who I think will be head and shoulders above the rest of the TE's), and the Number #1 QB in a very QB friendly league?!
I can def get a serviceable WR in the 4 or 5th round like a Cooper or Hopkins.
So why not grab the #1 TE (who I think will be head and shoulders above the rest of the TE's), and the Number #1 QB in a very QB friendly league?!
I can def get a serviceable WR in the 4 or 5th round like a Cooper or Hopkins.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 9:58 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
quote:
I can def get a serviceable WR in the 4 or 5th round like a Cooper or Hopkins.
doubtful
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:11 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
It's a 10 man league. You'll be fine
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 10:12 am
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:15 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
quote:
So why not grab the #1 TE (who I think will be head and shoulders above the rest of the TE's)
why not the #1 Kicker then, or #1 DEF? Com'on maaan!
It's all about value. You would be leaving waaay too much value on the board if you use your first round pick on Gronk. Antonio Gates did just about as well as Gronk last year. Draft Gates in the later rounds.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:16 am to LSUChamp06
quote:
CJ Anderson could be this season's Zac Stacy. Always be weary of the RB who did really well at the end of the season.
Or zac Stacy just sucks and Anderson is good. One has nothing to do with the other whatsoever.
I mean, Keenan Allen was great as a rookie then sucked. Therefore be wary of Odell Beckham Jr coming off a strong rookie campaign
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:30 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
Picking Gronk at 8 is fricking stupid. I'm sorry.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:31 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
quote:
Not a PPR league.
Yea, a Bryant pick maybe better there.
Any of the elite WRs are a better pick than Gronk
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:41 am to LSUChamp06
quote:
CJ Anderson could be this season's Zac Stacy. Always be weary of the RB who did really well at the end of the season.
There will be another CJ Anderson/Zac Stacy pick up later this year.
or maybe he'll be Le'Veon Bell
Posted on 8/20/15 at 10:48 am to Goldrush25
quote:
If you make that pick make it being fully aware that Gronk is not a top 5 receiving target.
his last 2 full seasons played, on average:
86 catches, 1225 yards, 14 TDs
Let's not forget the pace he was on in 2013 thru 7 games before he got hurt
90 catches 1350 yards, 9 TDs
dude is a justifiable top 10 pick even in a 10 tm league
Posted on 8/20/15 at 11:27 am to ATLsuTiger
quote:
It's all about value.
If gronk plays a full season then his value is as high as anyone's (and mathematically maybe technically the highest) in leagues that have to start a TE. Many starting TE's won't have half his points.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 11:34 am to CocoLoco
quote:
Any of the elite WRs are a better pick than Gronk
There are what? A half dozen maybe more wr's that will be making in the same class of point range. A healthy Gronk is only rivaled by Graham who is in a new system this year.
It seems like people preaching about positional value in this thread aren't considering positional value.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 11:38 am to Abikaasa_Posti_Teel
Crazy? No. It would have a slim chance at success though.
In a 10 team league last year I went QB-WR with my first two picks and i was the worst team in the league.
In a 10 team league last year I went QB-WR with my first two picks and i was the worst team in the league.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News