- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Up 51. He has Brady and Edelman
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:05 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:05 am
I'm scared. He also has the Ravens D but is choosing to bench them
Posted on 12/12/16 at 6:56 am to lsushelly
I would think you are safe, however if Brady has a big day and a few of the TDs are to Edelman they may make you nervous. Especially if it's PPR.
What do you mean sitting the Ravens D? Is he not playing a defense at all?
What do you mean sitting the Ravens D? Is he not playing a defense at all?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:03 am to Hold That Tiger 10
Yes. Not playing a D. He's my son in law. We talked about it and his reasoning is if Brady and Edelman go nuts, he doesn't want to go negative on D. I think it's a huge risk
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:05 am to Hold That Tiger 10
I'm up 18 and he has Malcolm Mitchell and Justin Tucker. Gonna be close. Isn't the weather supposed to be bad?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:11 am to Paul Allen
Just looked. Weather is bad now...but drops to 10% precipitation for the rest of the day.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:35 am to lsushelly
He should play his D IMO
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:36 am to jamalsdeck
Ravens D is tough. I feel a low scoring game tonight.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:37 am to lsushelly
Since he's desperate he should play his D and hope for maybe some sort of fumble scoop and score idk
Especially if it's bad weather
Especially if it's bad weather
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:44 am to lsushelly
quote:
Yes. Not playing a D. He's my son in law. We talked about it and his reasoning is if Brady and Edelman go nuts, he doesn't want to go negative on D. I think it's a huge risk
That seems really dumb IMO
What's the most negative the D can even go? Seems high risk low reward
Posted on 12/12/16 at 9:57 am to Eighteen
I've seen a D go -5 in our league. But that's only if they give up about 40. Like I said, I think it's a high risk as well.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:15 am to lsushelly
I mean, the man has got a point, and it's something to consider for sure. What are the defensive settings for yards and points?
With that said, his odds are better if he plays the BAL D.
Just a recent example from yesterday, Sieman+Sanders+Titans D probably netted close to that.
With that said, his odds are better if he plays the BAL D.
Just a recent example from yesterday, Sieman+Sanders+Titans D probably netted close to that.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:28 am to castorinho
28-34 pts allowed -3
35+ pts-7
35+ pts-7
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:02 am to lsushelly
Dann...I'm wouldn't not play a D, unless y'all settings are really tough for D. I'm assuming points for a sack, int, and turnover. Special teams touchdowns?
My prediction is not playing a D cost him this game. 6 points from defense, 15 from edelman, 30 from Brady....that's really not a huge stretch.
My prediction is not playing a D cost him this game. 6 points from defense, 15 from edelman, 30 from Brady....that's really not a huge stretch.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:28 am to lsushelly
then he should play the defense for sure.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:48 am to Hold That Tiger 10
I guess I can see it potentially happening...
If he's banking on 40 from Brady and 10-15 from Edelman then the Balt D would hit the -7... But if Brady only ends up getting 28-30 and then there's a special teams TD, fumble recovery, few sacks, etc it could cost him.
Really no way to know
If he's banking on 40 from Brady and 10-15 from Edelman then the Balt D would hit the -7... But if Brady only ends up getting 28-30 and then there's a special teams TD, fumble recovery, few sacks, etc it could cost him.
Really no way to know
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:55 am to Eighteen
Yeah it's a risk either way...however, personally I would rather have 3 trying to score 51 versus 2.
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 11:56 am
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:58 am to lsushelly
if he knew his QB and WR were playing against his D this week, and he was worried about negative points because its brady, why didnt he just pick up a different D before yesterday?
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:59 am to Ash Williams
Because he didn't know he'd be down 51.
Playing the D still gives him the better chance to win
Playing the D still gives him the better chance to win
Posted on 12/12/16 at 12:36 pm to Ash Williams
quote:
if he knew his QB and WR were playing against his D this week, and he was worried about negative points because its brady, why didnt he just pick up a different D before yesterday?
Great point. Any D against the Patriots at home is a terrible play, especially going against multiple Patriots players. There had to be a better play on the WW and a player on his bench he could drop for it.
Posted on 12/12/16 at 12:46 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Great point. Any D against the Patriots at home is a terrible play, especially going against multiple Patriots players. There had to be a better play on the WW and a player on his bench he could drop for it.
Agreed...but nothing can be done now.
My pick up of Atlanta is what will carry my to round 2. Some people rather stick with one defense though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News