- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/6/12 at 10:32 am to reddman
you mean people aren't colluding in week 1?!
Posted on 9/6/12 at 10:36 am to reddman
quote:
ESPN introduced this option to allow leagues to decide whether a trade is fair to both parties and to prevent collusion.
It doesn't even make sense for Team A. They will be left with 1 "startable" RB in Marshawn Lynch, who is injured right now!
The only reason I may say not to veto would be because it looks like an 8 or 10 team league and everyone has All-Stars.
But if it is less than a 14 team league, Starks shouldn't be rostered.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:04 am to Brodeur
You're right. These guys are just trolling you.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:07 am to Bearded Angler
Only veto if it creates incomplete or illegal roster. Otherwise but the frick out.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:03 pm to Bearded Angler
with the years Charles, CJ2K, and Britt are coming off of last year, there is no way you can veto this.
theres a lot of uncertainty to that side
you'd be a bad commish if you vetoed that
theres a lot of uncertainty to that side
you'd be a bad commish if you vetoed that
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:16 pm to Brian Wilson
quote:
Only veto if it creates incomplete or illegal roster. Otherwise but the frick out.
Never heard the pro-collusion argument before!
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:24 pm to Brodeur
quote:
But if it is less than a 14 team league, Starks shouldn't be rostered.
You don't decide who other teams roster or who they trade for. Sorry pal.
If you play with idiots who make stupid trades you dont like them don't play with them
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:33 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
If you play with idiots who make stupid trades you dont like them don't play with them
That's why I said I would consider booting his arse from the league
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:51 pm to Brodeur
quote:
I guess I just play in a competitive league without a bunch of idiots
How is this possible... if u r n it? BOOOOOOOOM!!!
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:13 pm to HeadCoach
quote:
How is this possible... if u r n it? BOOOOOOOOM!!!
Weakest boom ever. And are you typing with 1 finger?
quote:
bunch of idiots
I didn't say there weren't any idiots in my league, I said there aren't a bunch of them
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:15 pm to Brodeur
quote:
I didn't say there weren't any idiots in my league, I said there aren't a bunch of them
So you just admitted u r an idiot. Showed me
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:15 pm to Brodeur
You sound miserable. Are you miserable? You sound like you might be.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 1:19 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
but Calvin is clearly head and shoulders the best player in the trade
I'd rather have the other Johnson.
Posted on 9/6/12 at 2:25 pm to CQQ
quote:
You sound miserable. Are you miserable? You sound like you might be.
Bc we disagree on what constitutes a reasonable veto?
Has anyone ever had someone in their league guilty of collusion?
It seems like it would be the easiest thing in the world to do and the hardest thing to prove
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News