- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDFL Week 4: Monday Night Miracle Edition
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:04 pm to GynoSandberg
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:04 pm to GynoSandberg
you offered me Garcon for fricking Forsett and a day later you trade him for Shane Vereen. Im sorry but your willingness to try and frick me in the arse was a bit of a turnoff and didn't really deserve much of a response.
This post was edited on 9/30/15 at 4:06 pm
4
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:06 pm to CE Tiger
Justin Forsett looks like Justin Forsett always has, expect 2014
Lets not act like youre rostering a top flight RB here, bub
ETA: 21, let me give you 2 for Alshon... you dont want to start CJ2k at 1-2
Lets not act like youre rostering a top flight RB here, bub
ETA: 21, let me give you 2 for Alshon... you dont want to start CJ2k at 1-2
This post was edited on 9/30/15 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:09 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
but your willingness to try and frick me in the arse was a bit of a turnoff and didn't really deserve much of a response.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:12 pm to CE Tiger
Are we talking about the same Forsett, mate? Vereen has outscored him thus far, as has Garcon, who is sporting a healthy, consistent 13 ppg. Goes a long way in a top 6 finish.
If you were an owner who truly wanted to get into a Garcon, you wouldve turned to the other 62 RBs you owned and tried to get a deal done.
If you were an owner who truly wanted to get into a Garcon, you wouldve turned to the other 62 RBs you owned and tried to get a deal done.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:18 pm to Toula
CE posted on here that he has 4 startable RBs available and that he needed a WR. I popped him up and said that I could trade him Wright since he is on my bench. He said that he would never do that since Wright is on bye, because he would be giving me an advantage.
Stay with me here....
So I pointed out that Wright would be on my bench regardless if he was on bye or not. His point was that he couldn't start Wright this week so I would be getting the upper hand. Apparantly he has RBs with no bye weeks, because if they did then he would have the ability to start Wright on their bye week and that it evens out.
Turns out I am a massive tard who just doesn't get it
Stay with me here....
So I pointed out that Wright would be on my bench regardless if he was on bye or not. His point was that he couldn't start Wright this week so I would be getting the upper hand. Apparantly he has RBs with no bye weeks, because if they did then he would have the ability to start Wright on their bye week and that it evens out.
Turns out I am a massive tard who just doesn't get it
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:23 pm to PortCityTiger24
Plz join me in downvoting both CE and Toula, mate
(that's toula in the gif fwiw)
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:29 pm to GynoSandberg
Woah. WTF man!
That's uncalled for.
That's uncalled for.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:31 pm to PortCityTiger24
in a top 6 format what do I gain by giving you a startable player in a week that does nothing to improve my lineup. if you are trading Wright I could probably go after him next week and get use out of him. i really don't understand why thats hard to understand, it makes sense to the 3 other guys who were sitting in my office when i was talking about that deal.
i guess ill just never make a deal with the elites of tdfl. guess ill just stick with trading Papps
in a head to head league would you make a trade with a guy you are playing that week to improve his lineup and gain nothing.
i guess ill just never make a deal with the elites of tdfl. guess ill just stick with trading Papps
in a head to head league would you make a trade with a guy you are playing that week to improve his lineup and gain nothing.
This post was edited on 9/30/15 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:38 pm to CE Tiger
i wouldve traded you garcon for jennings. you said you "didnt like frenchy". whatcha want me to do? that's up to you to counter at that point
and port may be an elite but i am a cellar dweller in this league
and port may be an elite but i am a cellar dweller in this league
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:43 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
i guess ill just never make a deal with the elites of tdfl. guess ill just stick with trading Papps
I don't want Forsett, in case that wasn't clear in my previous post
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:45 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
in a top 6 format what do I gain by giving you a startable player in a week that does nothing to improve my lineup. if you are trading Wright I could probably go after him next week and get use out of him. i really don't understand why thats hard to understand, it makes sense to the 3 other guys who were sitting in my office when i was talking about that deal.
What you don't understand is that based on your logic, I would just hold Wright until after your RB had a bye week to even it out. Tell the guys in the cubes next to you that they are equally as retarded as you.
jk but tell them anyway.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:53 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
I would just hold Wright until after your RB had a bye week to even it out.
and if you were trading to build depth you could do that. but im pretty sure the rb i traded you would have went into your lineup this week over doug martin.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:54 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
and if you were trading to build depth you could do that. but im pretty sure the rb i traded you would have went into your lineup this week over doug martin.
And the WR (wright) I would trade you would likely start the week the RB you traded me was on bye. I am having a hard time seeing how you don't understand this.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 4:59 pm to PortCityTiger24
mate, ya think he'd play Wright the 3 weeks his 3 RBs had a bye?
That's a serious advantage
That's a serious advantage
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:08 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
I am having a hard time seeing how you don't understand this.
We are heading into week 4. Wright's value is stagnant this week, theres no reason to get him this week to sit on my bench. In the meantime Ivory, Forsett, or Jennings could have big weeks (not likely) but it could happen and potentially increase their value. Or Lacy could get injured again and my rb depth would better suit me to not have make the trade. It could back fire and one of them could tear an acl as well. Since my crystal ball is broken, I thought it would be best to let the week play out and if I wanted Wright he would potentially be there next week.
Unless you pull a Gyno and trade him for Darren McFadden
This post was edited on 9/30/15 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:09 pm to Toula
quote:
mate, ya think he'd play Wright the 3 weeks his 3 RBs had a bye?
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:11 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
Since my crystal ball is broken, I thought it would be best to let the week play out and if I wanted Wright he would potentially be there next week.
That makes much more sense than the "you get the advantage this week" argument.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:13 pm to PortCityTiger24
Tiger sucks. Seems like all the talk on the droppings side.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:14 pm to dj30
I drafted well.
Posted on 9/30/15 at 5:15 pm to CE Tiger
quote:
Unless you pull a Gyno and trade him for Darren McFadden
not sure im following
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News