- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Starting a "Keeper" option in my league...
Posted on 7/27/12 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 7/27/12 at 2:57 pm
I know similar questions have been asked about how to start up keeper leagues etc, but this is a little different (I think) than some of the other questions previously asked.
I am commissioner of my league and we are starting a 1 keeper. My question is how do those that are in keeper leagues govern what happens if teams want to keep someone that was either traded to them or that was picked up off of waivers.
I am thinking that keeping a traded player is off-limits and keeping a waiver-acquired player costs you a Round 3 pick. Do your leagues allow that? What does it cost you? Is that too high/low of a round?
I am commissioner of my league and we are starting a 1 keeper. My question is how do those that are in keeper leagues govern what happens if teams want to keep someone that was either traded to them or that was picked up off of waivers.
I am thinking that keeping a traded player is off-limits and keeping a waiver-acquired player costs you a Round 3 pick. Do your leagues allow that? What does it cost you? Is that too high/low of a round?
Posted on 7/27/12 at 3:16 pm to lsuxtremist
quote:
I am thinking that keeping a traded player is off-limits
This post was edited on 7/27/12 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 7/27/12 at 3:28 pm to lsuxtremist
The keeper league I'm in doesn't penalize you for keeping a certain caliber player, although I wished it would. It keeps a sense of balance in the league.
And as far as not being able to keep a traded player, it makes zero sense.
And as far as not being able to keep a traded player, it makes zero sense.
Posted on 7/27/12 at 4:03 pm to bbeck
quote:
And as far as not being able to keep a traded player, it makes zero sense.
I just imagine the scenario of some sort of collusion between two teams.
However it could be useful, and I doubt any of the participants would want to unilaterally help out another team.
Just thinking of the different problems which could arise.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News