- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should I take this trade? Gronk/DT88 or Dez for Landry/Edelman**update**
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:38 pm
I would be getting Gronk/DT88
PPR, 12 man, w/ return yards
My team..
QB: Bortles, Matt Ryan
RB: Woodhead, Riddick, Sims, Blount, Duke Johnson
WR: Antonio Brown, Landry, Edelman, TY Hilton, Hurns
TE: Kelce
K: Santos
Def: Panthers
His WR are Alshon, Dez, DT88
His RB are Hyde, Mathews, t. Coleman, Crowell
PPR, 12 man, w/ return yards
My team..
QB: Bortles, Matt Ryan
RB: Woodhead, Riddick, Sims, Blount, Duke Johnson
WR: Antonio Brown, Landry, Edelman, TY Hilton, Hurns
TE: Kelce
K: Santos
Def: Panthers
His WR are Alshon, Dez, DT88
His RB are Hyde, Mathews, t. Coleman, Crowell
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 10:07 pm
3
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:40 pm to Cecil D Diesel
I think I would. 2rd/2wr/1flex?
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:41 pm to Peazey
Yeah it's 2/2/1. Flex can be RB, WR, TE
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:46 pm to Cecil D Diesel
Edelman and Landry are really good in PPR, but I think you have enough depth for letting them go to be worth it. You are taking back the risk of DT88 though with the injury and QB issue in Denver. Before the season, I thought he was good value despite the QB situation. The injury raises some concern. I guess there's some concern about the Gronk injury too. You are taking risk there too, but it also means that you are buying him as low as you could possibly get him.
There's a lot of uncertainty, but I think I would go for it.
ETA: I'll throw in that I'm not sure how return yards effect this. Does Edelman still return punts? Is he a lot more valuable because of this?
There's a lot of uncertainty, but I think I would go for it.
ETA: I'll throw in that I'm not sure how return yards effect this. Does Edelman still return punts? Is he a lot more valuable because of this?
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 9/14/16 at 7:57 pm to Peazey
Yeah, it is a lot of risk here, this is a tough one for me though.
On one hand, I like the consistency of the two I have. However, the thought of AB and Gronk along with DT88 is enticing.
I think Amendola was returning punts against the Cards
On one hand, I like the consistency of the two I have. However, the thought of AB and Gronk along with DT88 is enticing.
I think Amendola was returning punts against the Cards
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:08 pm to Cecil D Diesel
Now the offer is Gronk+Dez or DT88 for Edelman and Landry
Does that make it more enticing?
Does that make it more enticing?
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:40 pm to Cecil D Diesel
I would take Gronk and... Dez...
In my league, some owner just traded away Dez for Ryan Mathews
Dez owner also traded away Stewart and Alshon for Miller and Lockett. I think the league just wants the guy to win. His lineup of consists of...
Green
Dez
Marshall
Decker
Miller
Latavious
Demarco
In my league, some owner just traded away Dez for Ryan Mathews
Dez owner also traded away Stewart and Alshon for Miller and Lockett. I think the league just wants the guy to win. His lineup of consists of... Green
Dez
Marshall
Decker
Miller
Latavious
Demarco
Posted on 9/14/16 at 10:50 pm to forksup
Now the he said he would throw in Mathews.
The two offers are:
Landry and Edelman for Gronk/DT88 or Dez/Mathews
Edelman and Riddick for Gronk
The two offers are:
Landry and Edelman for Gronk/DT88 or Dez/Mathews
Edelman and Riddick for Gronk
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:23 pm to Cecil D Diesel
So receiving Dez and Gronk isn't an option? If you want Dez then he comes with Mathews? I'd probably avoid that and lean towards the DT88 and Gronk deal. It's practically only a matter of time before Mathews is injured. I have him on my team, and I'm biding my time.
Edelman and Riddick might not be bad either, but you are already really thin at rb.
I guess something else to keep in mind is that if you get Gronk then Kielce becomes pretty solid trade bait. Maybe that's a piece you can use in this trade or another later one.
Edelman and Riddick might not be bad either, but you are already really thin at rb.
I guess something else to keep in mind is that if you get Gronk then Kielce becomes pretty solid trade bait. Maybe that's a piece you can use in this trade or another later one.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:25 pm to Peazey
Thanks for the advice bro.
I just did Edelman and Riddick for Gronk and Tevin Coleman
Think I may move Kelce for a RB, and start Hurns or Landry in the flex
Basically, I could have had (Dez or DT88) plus Mathews added on for Landry. I wanted to keep Landry though
I just did Edelman and Riddick for Gronk and Tevin Coleman
Think I may move Kelce for a RB, and start Hurns or Landry in the flex
Basically, I could have had (Dez or DT88) plus Mathews added on for Landry. I wanted to keep Landry though
This post was edited on 9/14/16 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:30 pm to Cecil D Diesel
I think you did well. That's a steal for Gronk.
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:32 pm to Cecil D Diesel
yes
Posted on 9/14/16 at 11:46 pm to Peazey
Thanks bros. Good luck and blessings
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News