- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Owner wanting to move ODB, Vetoes?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:03 am
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:03 am
An owner wants to move Odell
trade 1 which was vetoed because of lots of complaints was
Odell
for
Dak and Markus Wheaton
trade 2 is
Odell
for
Tyrell Williams
Martellus Bennett
Wendell Smallwood
Now owners are complaining this trade should also be vetoed due to the precedent set by vetoing trade 1
Thoughts?
trade 1 which was vetoed because of lots of complaints was
Odell
for
Dak and Markus Wheaton
trade 2 is
Odell
for
Tyrell Williams
Martellus Bennett
Wendell Smallwood
Now owners are complaining this trade should also be vetoed due to the precedent set by vetoing trade 1
Thoughts?
14
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:05 am to PokerChamp21
Those are both shite trades and if league has say in vetoing trade then yea both are veto worthy
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:07 am to PokerChamp21
I don't like vetoing trades unless it's obvious collusion. That being said, I can't see how any rational fantasy football player would think that's even close to a poor return for Odell. That trade is abysmal and whoever is trying to give Odell away for waiver wire type guys wouldn't be asked to rejoin my league next year if I was involved.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:09 am to PokerChamp21
if he wants to get rid of him for shite players, he should just drop him and pick up whoever is in FA
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:09 am to PokerChamp21
Was it collusion?
Both are pretty hilarious especially the first one
, but if no collusion who are you to judge
Both are pretty hilarious especially the first one
, but if no collusion who are you to judge 
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:11 am to PokerChamp21
Those are absolute trash trades.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:12 am to PokerChamp21
VETO..... No questions asked.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:13 am to PokerChamp21
I rarely veto, but those are close to veto worthy
I think records of each team should be a factor in this scenario
I think records of each team should be a factor in this scenario
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:19 am to PokerChamp21
Both are veto worthy
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:22 am to PokerChamp21
I would veto both trades for collusion. No one with the ability to merely set up a yahoo or ESPN fantasy football account is stupid enough to give away OBJ for those players. Therefore, it is collusion.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:25 am to PokerChamp21
Those are really really really bad trades. Almost bad enough to think collusion or brain damage. I'm usually against vetos, but shite.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:33 am to PokerChamp21
lol im in this league
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:34 am to oleyeller
Are you the Odell owner?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:35 am to Ash Williams
negative.. you can prob pick me out by my tennessee vols related team name
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:46 am to oleyeller
You veto those trades?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 10:53 am to Peazey
it is commish veto, this is a 20 team league. Both teams sucked.... yeah both are dumb trades to me, but i dont believe it is collusion... Just someone tired of obj and ready to unload him. They paid their money like i did, not my job to run their teams. It wasnt a 4-0 team trading with a 0-4 team. Both teams i think have 1 win.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 11:00 am to oleyeller
If Doug Martin is switched out for Smallwood is this a fair deal?
Posted on 10/7/16 at 11:08 am to PokerChamp21
its more even trade... but man its not about being fair. As long as it is not collusion i have no problem with it. It isnt my job to run other peoples team. I cant get mad because someone made a trade that makes someones team better than mine. If both owners are okay with the trade, and they are not working together to load one team up "doesnt seem this way" then trade is fine by me
Posted on 10/7/16 at 11:08 am to PokerChamp21
quote:
If Doug Martin is switched out for Smallwood is this a fair deal?
I wouldn't think it was vetoable if that's what you mean. Still think the guy giving up Odell shouldn't be playing fantasy football, but I wouldn't veto if it was Martin instead.
Posted on 10/7/16 at 11:11 am to castorinho
quote:
Was it collusion?
Im big on "no vetoes unless collusion" guy, but those trades are total bullshite.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News