- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I picked up Sanchez...should I go with him?
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:13 pm
No really good QBs on waiver wire, I have Philip Rivers and Tannehill....I'm in the championship game mainly due to my RBs but think I might need to get some points this week with QB since Murray may not be as good at RB.
Thoughts? No PPR.
Thoughts? No PPR.
4
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:15 pm to Kingwood Tiger
Non-PPR, Sanchez.
PPR, Tannehill.
PPR, Tannehill.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:23 pm to boom roasted
Terrible advice. Rivers is the obvious PPR play.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:25 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Yeah you right. Guess that's why I'm out of the playoffs.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 4:38 pm to Kingwood Tiger
frick him, he cost me a birth in the Super Bowl.
No.
No.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 5:22 pm to boom roasted
I'm confused.. Why would PPR affect the QB at all?
I'm in a non PPR league but isn't PPR point-per-reception? and it only helps out WRs and RBs?
I'm in the same boat is this guy. Got Rivers and Tannehill. I'm prob rolling with Tennehill because Rivers fricking sucks.
I'm in a non PPR league but isn't PPR point-per-reception? and it only helps out WRs and RBs?
I'm in the same boat is this guy. Got Rivers and Tannehill. I'm prob rolling with Tennehill because Rivers fricking sucks.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 5:32 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Non-PPR, Sanchez.
PPR, Tannehill.
Wtf
Posted on 12/17/14 at 5:41 pm to Dr. Shultz
lol
It doesn't. Just messing around with OP for including that tidbit.
It doesn't. Just messing around with OP for including that tidbit.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 9:06 pm to CBandits82
quote:
frick him, he cost me a birth in the Super Bowl.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 9:48 pm to Kingwood Tiger
I don't think I would mind starting him this week. High floor, okay ceiling with a chance to go for 20+
Posted on 12/17/14 at 9:51 pm to forksup
He probably means point per reception
I play in a league where it is 1 point per reception
I play in a league where it is 1 point per reception
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:08 pm to Kingwood Tiger
I would play Rivers over Sanchez. Rivers was big for me all year. He's burned me a few times here later in the season but Sanchez sucked the last two weeks. I'm playing Romo over Rivers but I still believe Rivers can put up solid numbers.
Posted on 12/17/14 at 10:23 pm to boom roasted
Tannehill is a PPR beast 
LINK
Anyway, the lowest QBR rating against the Redskins this season is 101. Sanchez will be fine. And if they throw inside the five last week instead of handing it off to Polk Sanchez has a decent line.
LINK Anyway, the lowest QBR rating against the Redskins this season is 101. Sanchez will be fine. And if they throw inside the five last week instead of handing it off to Polk Sanchez has a decent line.
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 10:27 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News