Started By
Message
locked post

HUGE trade

Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:10 pm
Posted by lsuswag
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
361 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:10 pm
Should I accept this trade?
I receive: Stevan Ridley
Tony Romo
Russell Wilson

I send: Peyton Manning
David Wilson (might not be starting anymore)



Posted by GreenTrout
Toledo Bend
Member since Jul 2013
1010 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:11 pm to


I'm not giving Manning up for Romo(Wilson)/Ridley combo. Just isn't going to happen.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27231 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:12 pm to
frick no. Ridley is going to be roller coaster because Belichick is bipolar. You can't start both QBs, so don't let that influence you.

Stevan Ridley
Tony Romo

David Wilson
Peyton Manning

Peyton could win you your league this year. Romo will choke in your championship game.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:12 pm to
2 qb league?
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6941 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:12 pm to
Wouldn't even consider that trade.
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31736 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:14 pm to
You gain nothing.

It's almost lateral. You are actually losing at QB. Wilson will be just fine in NY. He isn't losing his spot.

quote:

frick no. Ridley is going to be roller coaster because Belichick is bipolar. You can't start both QBs, so don't let that influence you.


Vereen is on IR til Week 11. I'd buy Ridley low in most cases as he has a chance to regain his primary role this week. Bellicheck made his point. Ridley should respond well. (I hope )
This post was edited on 9/10/13 at 4:15 pm
Posted by 12Buck
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2005
592 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:23 pm to
I think Ridley will be solid with Vereen out now. He was averaging over 5 YPC before he was yanked. That being said. I also think Wilson will continue to contribute (maybe not this week) and Manning is better than either of those QBs (no idea why you'd want two QBs, it adds no value). If you replaced one of those QBs with a WR2ish. I'd probably accept it. Otherwise... No.
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
17886 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:26 pm to
Take RW out of the equation; would you trade Manning/DWilson for Romo/Ridley? Bench points aren't going to help you.
Posted by lsuswag
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
361 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:30 pm to
What about if I took out Wilson and put in Cobb.

So I would get Cobb, Ridley, and Romo
Posted by lsuswag
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
361 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:41 pm to
I think I'm gonna accept with Cobb
Posted by GreenTrout
Toledo Bend
Member since Jul 2013
1010 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:43 pm to
I just don't see why you'd want to get rid of Manning for a second tier QB&RB. Go play the waivers and get you another RB, or go make some trades yourself. I just wouldn't be giving up the person who could win you the championship.
Posted by lsuswag
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
361 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:46 pm to
Cause right now I'm starting Jamaal Charles, David Wilson, and Isaac Redman (until LeVeon Bell is back) at my running backs and I need a solid running back option. But I guess Peyton is too valuable...
Posted by GreenTrout
Toledo Bend
Member since Jul 2013
1010 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 4:51 pm to
So you need another back. Who's on the wire, and who is on your bench. Can you make any trades to get someone else w/o giving up Manning?
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50432 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:23 pm to
Hell no to both trades.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram