Started By
Message

re: Aaron Rodgers or Fitzpatrick

Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20245 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Fitzy 14.38
Rodgers 14.12

Print the shirts!

I bet you also started David Wilson oh oracle of fantasy football.

Seriously though, you never bench Rodgers, especially not for Fitzpatrick.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:18 pm to
I love these threads because when they are wrong they hope no one bumps them but when they are right it becomes "I told you so"
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31073 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:19 pm to
Rodgers outscores Fitzpatrick by an average of 7.5 points per game.

frick matchups. You play your studs.

Looking at this point differential, you should play Bradshaw over Peterson if he is a way better matchup. Also, you should start Cecil Shorts over Brandon Marshall when the Jags play a favorable opponent.

Sure, it could happen, but there is a far better chance that Rodgers will outscore Fitzpatrick. It is not worth the risk. Fitzpatrick can never put up monster games like Rodgers has.
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36903 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:22 pm to
Well, in my league, Rodgers outscored Fitz by 2. I won my matchup by 1 point.

So I would have been fricked.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26636 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

Rodgers outscores Fitzpatrick by an average of 7.5 points per game.

frick matchups. You play your studs.

Looking at this point differential, you should play Bradshaw over Peterson if he is a way better matchup. Also, you should start Cecil Shorts over Brandon Marshall when the Jags play a favorable opponent.

Sure, it could happen, but there is a far better chance that Rodgers will outscore Fitzpatrick. It is not worth the risk. Fitzpatrick can never put up monster games like Rodgers has.


I like to look at trends too and Rogers is trending down with Brees while Cam is trending up. Top guy in my league(i'm one behind) has Brees and has started him the past three weeks while RG3 tore it up. Brees has declined during that same time so he switches this week. Sure it's no way near Rodgers/Fitz bad, but As of this moment, the only sure starts over anybody regardless is RG3(healthy) AP, Marshall, Megatron, and Foster.
Posted by coopsdad
Luling, LA
Member since Sep 2009
917 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:39 pm to
All I know is I am second in my league and secured a playoff spot and a minimum of $100. Those of you that don't follow match ups and trends are suckers.
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20245 posts
Posted on 12/9/12 at 11:56 pm to


You're still an idiot if you even consider starting Fitzpatrick over Rodgers.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/10/12 at 7:52 am to
What matchup are you talking about? Rams have a better pass D and Fitz has been horrible all year. If you started Fitz, you're an idiot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram