Started By
Message

re: Breaking... Trump files law suit in NV

Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

This means they have proof
i doubt it...i don't doubt dems cheat in every state, but lawsuits are pretty easy to file.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146671 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

BNO NewsVerified account @BNONews
BREAKING: Trump files lawsuit in Nevada alleging Clark County kept polls open 2 hrs beyond closing time; officials deny the allegation - CNN

LINK
Posted by Wideman
Arlington, Virginia
Member since Jul 2005
11721 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:25 pm to
he's filing suit because a polling station in Clark County remained opened two hours after 'closing'.

However, the polls must remain open until everyone who was in line at the time of closing has a chance to vote. I think he's going to have a difficult time proving anything nefarious here.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80208 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

he's filing suit because a polling station in Clark County remained opened two hours after 'closing'.

However, the polls must remain open until everyone who was in line at the time of closing has a chance to vote. I think he's going to have a difficult time proving anything nefarious here.


But I was told Republicans don't try to suppress voter turnout
Posted by makinskrilla
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jun 2009
9727 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:27 pm to
He didn't really have a chance in NV.

I don't think this is a good sign.
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:28 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:29 pm to
yeah, it's official. Nevada is blue

means in addition to winning the big 3, he has to pair NH with CO or peel off one of the big bad rust belts

Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51798 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:29 pm to
How expecting rules to be followed suppressing voter turn out?

It clearly said they believe the people weren't in line at closing time.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53449 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:31 pm to
Video proof!
Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
6091 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:34 pm to
He's going to win Michigan.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:37 pm to
quote:



But I was told Republicans don't try to suppress voter turnout


These are Hispanic precints.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

its a bogus suit, as its SOP for them.
Are the Dem legal actions yesterday SOP?
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Are the Dem legal actions yesterday SOP?


i have no idea what you are talking about
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12791 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:39 pm to
It wasn't because the polling location stayed open longer.

LINK

quote:

The Trump campaign claims that others – who were not in line when the polls closed – were nonetheless allowed to vote.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

i have no idea what you are talking about
I linked all the shite Hillionaire has already done. I will go find it opn the polibaord. Drac Sanctions was whining about the evil Rs.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73432 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Are the Dem legal actions yesterday SOP? i have no idea what you are talking about

LINK

LINK

LINK
Ohio Democrats want the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in their voter intimidation lawsuit in the swing state.

The party has filed an emergency request for the nation’s high court to lift a Cincinnati-based federal appeals court order. That ruling Sunday granted the Donald Trump campaign’s request to block a federal judge’s restraining order Democrats said was needed to prevent voter intimidation.

A 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals three-judge panel said Ohio Democrats didn’t show “a likelihood of success” on their case’s merits.

The party told the U.S. Supreme Court the appellate judges ruled without reviewing “critical evidence” a lower court judge relied on in ruling that anyone engaging in intimidation or harassment inside or near polling places would face contempt of court charges.

LINK

LINK
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9191 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:47 pm to
No it is best to file suit before you could possibly lose
1 after you lose it would look like sour grapes
2 if he does lose tonight, he will say he will not concede as he has pending litigation in these states due to voter fraud.

By the way I am on the train. Choo choo mf
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 12:52 pm
Posted by BigB0882
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5308 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 12:59 pm to
The real question is how can they prove someone got IN LINE after polls closed. Isn't that the rule? It isn't about voting after polls close, it is whether you were in line or not. I can't imagine any way to prove that unless they have video proof and even then it has to be shown to be part of some collusion by the DNC and not just a rogue polling station or worker.
Posted by 420centraltime
Gump nation
Member since Feb 2013
959 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:01 pm to
It's only 1 and you're already melting? Jesus man.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram