- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dems, Republicans unite to defeat conservative effort to defund Amtrak
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:11 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:11 am
IMO Amtrak should be privatized or the cost transferred to paying customers. This is a bad subsidy that shouldn't be placed on tax payer.
LINK
"
LINK
quote:
The House rejected a conservative proposal late Wednesday night to eliminate $1.1 billion in federal subsidies for Amtrak.
An amendment offered by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) to a government spending package for the next fiscal year failed on a 128-293 vote with a bipartisan coalition uniting in opposition.
Brooks, a member of the House Freedom Caucus who failed to advance in the Alabama Senate GOP primary last month, argued that Amtrak subsidies are unnecessary.
"Stated differently, what policy justification is there for forcing Americans who don't use Amtrak to subsidize the travel of Americans who do use Amtrak? I know of none," Brooks said during House floor debate.
"
quote:
We don't give these kinds of subsidies to people who ride on airplanes," he added.
But Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), the chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the Department of Transportation, said Brooks's amendment would be counterproductive. While Diaz-Balart diplomatically called Brooks "sincere," the Florida Republican said that eliminating Amtrak's federal subsidies would actually result in higher costs.
"This bill is not just arbitrary decisions. You see, we held hearings. And we carefully scrubbed each account to make sure that the reductions that we made were responsible and that were actually going to result in reductions," Diaz-Balart said.
"This is not the right way to do it," Diaz-Balart said of the proposal offered by Brooks. "It is not prudent to eliminate an entire transportation option, by the way."
Brooks countered that passengers should be able to pay the full costs of riding Amtrak trains, which reach more than 500 destinations in 46 states.
"I would submit that there is zero - zero - evidence that Amtrak passengers cannot absorb higher fares to pay their own way," Brooks said.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:16 am to Rakim
Spending other people's money always unites assholes.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:23 am to Rakim
Brooks does not have Amtrak service in his district, so his effort was easily discounted.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:06 am to Rakim
People who live in areas without Amtrak dailies want to gut it. People who live in areas with Amtrak dailies don't want to gut it. This is common sense.
When I lived in NOLA I would have wanted to gut it.
Now that I live in Milwaukee I'd fight to the death to keep it.
When I lived in NOLA I would have wanted to gut it.
Now that I live in Milwaukee I'd fight to the death to keep it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News