Started By
Message

re: The cooks trade really isn't as bad as what you think...

Posted on 3/12/17 at 2:37 pm to
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54063 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Because Rankins, Thomas and Bell were bad picks?


Lololololol, not sure you want to compare hits vs misses here
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:28 pm to
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71983 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:33 pm to
quote:


This trade exemplifies why they are winners and we are losers. i don't think anyone could argue that point. We have Drew fukin Brees one of the greatest of all time and we cannot even make the playoffs. Keep on believing in this administration there is a reason we have only been to 1 superbowl


so you're bitching about wasting Brees and here we are actually making moves to add more talent to the D through the draft
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 5:54 pm to
Hilarious right?

Posted by BLUEBEARD
BERMUDA TRIANGLE
Member since Aug 2014
547 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 6:15 pm to
Not a bad overall trade. I'm pretty sure Brees is gonna make Ginn better. Like to see the Saints get Jamal Adams.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54063 posts
Posted on 3/12/17 at 10:10 pm to
Yea, if the 18 th pick was ever on the table we would of taken it immediately.

We for sure didn't "pass" on a better deal.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram