- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Stopping Only 9% of Illegal Alien Border Crossers Would Pay for Trump wall
Posted on 2/16/17 at 11:53 am
Posted on 2/16/17 at 11:53 am
LINK
quote:
“[I]f a border wall stopped a small fraction of the illegal immigrants who are expected to come in the next decade, the fiscal savings from having fewer illegal immigrants in the country would be sufficient to cover the costs of the wall,” writes CIS Director of Research Steven Camarota.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 11:54 am to Jjdoc
BUT THERE IS NO WAY TO PAY FOR THE WALL!!!!
MEXICO WILL NOT PAY FOR THE WALL.
MEXICO WILL NOT PAY FOR THE WALL.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 11:55 am to Jjdoc
Stupid conservatives relying on facts and math
Posted on 2/16/17 at 11:58 am to Jjdoc
Those facts don't take into account feelings, children's tears and the fact that the wall signifies a new war on women somehow.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:02 pm to Jjdoc
What I get out of this chart, among other things, is it would save us money if we canceled all legal immigration and welcomed illegal immigration.
I kind of like that idea. If every immigrant was illegal, they'd get less services and we'd be able to kick them out at any point.
I kind of like that idea. If every immigrant was illegal, they'd get less services and we'd be able to kick them out at any point.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:08 pm to Jjdoc
Yeah let's just ignore all the money they bring in by working undesirable and necessary jobs for next to no pay
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:12 pm to dcrews
quote:
Those facts don't take into account feelings, children's tears and the fact that the wall signifies a new war on women somehow.
Actually, what it doesn't take into account is state vs. federal expenditures. The wall is a 100% federal expenditure. There's no way to tell how much of the savings will be realized by the federal government. Education and the criminal justice system, for example. California...huge savings at the state and local level. North Dakota...not so much.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:18 pm to novabill
MEXICO WILL NOT PAY FOR THIS WALL!!!!
AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:55 pm to dcrews
quote:
Those facts don't take into account feelings, children's tears and the fact that the wall signifies a new war on women somehow
True.....which is a little disappointing bc I would like to know the current market rate of a melting lib....anyone know?
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:56 pm to Jjdoc
I stopped reading after the first line: "the non-partisan Center for Immigration Studies".
The motto of the CIS is "Low Immigation, Pro Immigrant" -- whatever the f...k that doubletalk means.
Yes at some number the of immigrants the wall might pay for its self, but you can bet your a$$ its a lot more than 9%.
The motto of the CIS is "Low Immigation, Pro Immigrant" -- whatever the f...k that doubletalk means.
Yes at some number the of immigrants the wall might pay for its self, but you can bet your a$$ its a lot more than 9%.
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:56 pm to Jjdoc
quote:I won't be saisfied until it's 109%
Stopping Only 9% of Illegal Alien
Posted on 2/16/17 at 12:57 pm to Grim
quote:
Yeah let's just ignore all the money they bring in by working undesirable and necessary jobs for next to no pay
Wut?
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:00 pm to Jjdoc
Is that Mexico's money or US tax dollars?
Because Mexico is paying for the wall
Because Mexico is paying for the wall
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:12 pm to Jjdoc
He's pushing amnesty in this press conference. Now what?
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:13 pm to Grim
You advocate near slavery conditions
Nice
Nice
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:29 pm to Jjdoc
Link to Breitbart. Sure, that's legit. /sarcasm
"Just in - John Stamos's fluffer tells everyone how big John's penis is. Fluffer's new job of 'standing around for 100k a year' is not considered a factor."
"Just in - John Stamos's fluffer tells everyone how big John's penis is. Fluffer's new job of 'standing around for 100k a year' is not considered a factor."
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:29 pm to Grim
quote:
Yeah let's just ignore all the money they bring in by working undesirable and necessary jobs for next to no pay
Thanks for confirming that you and progressives support this:
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News