Started By
Message

Crowell or Blount?

Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:12 pm
Posted by RedElephants
Pittsburgh Steelers Fan
Member since Feb 2009
8126 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:12 pm
Really weak at RB. Will need one of these guys to serve as my RB2 basically the rest of the year and into the playoffs...

Only other backs I have are Vareen and Hillman.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28364 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:13 pm to
Crowell, you know what you're getting from him week to week. Blount is a mystery at the momeent
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
54060 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:13 pm to
lol, Crowell.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24634 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:13 pm to
I'd say Crowell, unless injury. But I own Crowell. They way Gray ran a couple of weeks ago leads me to believe that he's the future... Blount is old. Could be a rbbc
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25456 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:13 pm to
kind of a stupid question if you follow football at all.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:15 pm to
Crowell is the safer pick.
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6922 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:15 pm to
Blount had a great week, but he could be on the bench next week if he looks at Belichek wrong during practice.

Crowell is going to get you steady points every week.
Posted by RedElephants
Pittsburgh Steelers Fan
Member since Feb 2009
8126 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:18 pm to
Well Crowell is still battling west for carries and west actually got a couple more yesterday. It's understandable that if the Pats use the passing game vareen will get more snaps but blount looked good. If gray wasn't in the mix Blount would be a solid play imo. Idk I was leaning Crowell I just have the feeling blount will be solid too and get more RZ opportunities. Just throwing it out there.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24634 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:21 pm to
Even with this argument, Crowell makes more sense. Only two RBs in Cleveland.... And 3 in NE. Roll with both if need be, but Crowell will get carries. Can't say the same about Blount (just see what happened to gray)
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28364 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:22 pm to
Blount can be much more valuable than Crowell if Belichick would stick to a lead back. Blount showed last year he's RB2/lower RB1 range at the end of last season. Just hard to trust a RB every week especially when all it takes is a fumble to get taken out the game.
Posted by TIGERSby10
Central Lafourche
Member since Nov 2005
6922 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:49 pm to
For Blount or Gray, you could easily get a goose egg one week just because you don't see the field. With Crowell, you will put up decent points every week.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

kind of a stupid question if you follow football at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram