- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So we didn't have a thread regarding the Jimmy Kennedy Declaration?
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:22 am
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:22 am
3
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:24 am to Chad504boy
Take this shite to the German board.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:27 am to whodatfan
not so sure, these are specifics on his declaration filed.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:36 am to Chad504boy
I think he's a decent Treasurer. I got some bucks out of the publicized unclaimed money program.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:37 am to Chad504boy
Damn, that article makes a STRONG case for Vilma.
My God, the NFL botched this whole process.
My God, the NFL botched this whole process.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:42 am to Hoodoo Man
quote:
Damn, that article makes a STRONG case for Vilma.
My God, the NFL botched this whole process.
Yep, that is a very damning article which is why i made sure it got posted. Glad you took the time to read it unlike unnamed others.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 9:58 am to Chad504boy
one more place that there is no actual evidence.Posted on 10/19/12 at 10:19 am to 99DSTJ
If Goodell can prove that the NFL did in fact warn the Saints not to continue such a program, and the Saints ignored that warning, then we are still in some shite.
Obviously the NFL's focus on safety, or at least a need to be publicly perceived as a "safe" league has become more of a priority recently.
But if there was little or no actual warning to the Saints than we are getting screwed with all this.
Obviously the NFL's focus on safety, or at least a need to be publicly perceived as a "safe" league has become more of a priority recently.
But if there was little or no actual warning to the Saints than we are getting screwed with all this.
Posted on 10/19/12 at 10:25 am to Chad504boy
EVERYONE should read that link.
Here's a taste (forgive my 3 paragraphs chicken):
I hesitate to say this:
But thanks chad. Good job.
Here's a taste (forgive my 3 paragraphs chicken):
quote:
Former Minnesota Vikings defensive lineman Jimmy Kennedy submitted a signed declaration to the case filed in U.S. District Court in New Orleans. It stated the following: He said in the locker room during the 2010 NFC championship game, "They are hitting us like there's money on the table." He wasn't referring to any bounty program and was encouraging his teammates to block better for quarterback Brett Favre.
Four days later, then Vikings Coach Brad Childress approached Kennedy about a bounty being on Favre and Kennedy said he knew nothing about it. Kennedy also said he didn't approach Childress about a bounty on Favre because he knew nothing of a bounty.
Kennedy received a phone call from Joe Hummel, the lead investigator for the NFL in the Saints' bounty scandal. Kennedy told Hummel that he knew nothing about an allegation of a bounty placed on Favre. Kennedy said it wasn't an "interview." He referred to it as a brief call. Kennedy said he had another brief conversation with Hummel a few months later and said the same thing. He never spoke to Hummel again.
I hesitate to say this:
But thanks chad. Good job.
This post was edited on 10/19/12 at 10:27 am
Posted on 10/19/12 at 10:40 am to whodat912
quote:
If Goodell can prove that the NFL did in fact warn the Saints not to continue such a program, and the Saints ignored that warning, then we are still in some shite.
Obviously the NFL's focus on safety, or at least a need to be publicly perceived as a "safe" league has become more of a priority recently.
But if there was little or no actual warning to the Saints than we are getting screwed with all this.
But then if this is the case the players wouldn't be suspended, because I don't think that would fall into his "conduct detrimental to the league" jurisdiction
Posted on 10/19/12 at 10:43 am to ctalati32
quote:
But then if this is the case the players wouldn't be suspended, because I don't think that would fall into his "conduct detrimental to the league" jurisdiction
I think it would, all Goodell would say is that the policy has changed about paying for "big hits", that he warned the Saints specifically and that they chose not to obey, hence conduct detrimental to the league
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News