- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Verdict reached in Arbery trial
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:43 pm to LSULaw2009
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:43 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:
They again stated they didn't have any knowledge the deceased had done anything felonious
They just assumed he was stealing and went after him. They were the clear aggressors, Arbury was the one who attempted to defend himself and had every right to do it.
Arbury could have very well been casing, but there is no evidence of him stealing anything, the Perps had nothing on him and went full Barney Fife.
1
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:44 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
is it his running shoes being worn that make it so unbelievable to you? Or is it that his shorts had too many pockets?
This may be hard for you to believe, but most people don't have multiple different pairs of tennis shoes.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:48 pm to imjustafatkid
I expect my joggers to look like Bruce Jenner circa 1976. 
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:51 pm to mouton
quote:
You are an absolute trash poster.
He's also a troll.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:51 pm to davyjones
There was absolutely no doubt that he wasn't there for good reasons. These guys were for sure guilty.
However, if the left gets their way about "community policing," things like this will happen regularly.
However, if the left gets their way about "community policing," things like this will happen regularly.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:54 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Never said it did. I said it had something to do with not a single poster who's slinging around insults answering the question of what was more likely - Arbery is a jogger or he was there trying to steal shite. 80% of the posters in this thread have a significant reading comprehension problem.
As a real “jogger” my main frustration is the running community acting like he was shot out on a run and that black men can’t go for a jog without being harassed by racist white people.
The virtue signaling circle jerk in the running community is my issue.
I agree with this verdict and Rittenhouse.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:55 pm to 3nOut
quote:
As a real “jogger” my main frustration is the running community acting like he was shot out on a run and that black men can’t go for a jog without being harassed by racist white people.
The left is mentally ill.
I find it hard to try to be rational with them.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:56 pm to Azkiger
quote:
No one has answered my question as to what was more likely because they know the jogger narrative is media bullshite, but they also don't want to admit it because they think they're admitting they were wrong.
You’re high af right now.
He wasn’t jogging.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 1:58 pm to 3nOut
quote:
running community
Any community that pretends to be non-partisan and welcoming to all will inevitably be overrun and controlled by leftists.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:00 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Ok, let's blame it on politics not the fact that the 3 of them was guilty as heck
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:00 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:
Even if you can separate the two sentences and not read them in light of one another (which the law usually requires), suspicion under this language requires at least some knowledge that something felonious took place for the suspicion to be reasonable and probable.
The second sentence modifies the first.
You can attempt a citizens arrest if the offense was committed in your presence or immediate knowledge.
If that offense is a felony, then you don't need it to have been committed in your presence or immediate knowledge. Reasonable and probably grounds of suspicion is enough.
Entering property with the intent to steal is a felony in GA.
Hence my question, which was more likely? That Arbery is a jogger or he was there trying to steal stuff?
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:01 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
There was absolutely no doubt that he wasn't there for good reasons.
Probably, but as I'm sure we agree, supposition and speculation don't much fly in criminal courts of law. But point taken.
That said though, I can recall back in high school, during last hour P.E. when jogging essentially a cross country practice route was required, half the people in those classes were wearing very much similar to what Arbery was wearing in this instance. Hell I may've even gone with shorts, tshirt and redwing boots. Lol
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:02 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Entering property with the intent to steal is a felony in GA.
No evidence of this. Which is why they are going to jail for a long time. Good riddance.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:03 pm to Azkiger
quote:
The second sentence modifies the first. You can attempt a citizens arrest if the offense was committed in your presence or immediate knowledge.
You’re still wrong. And you’ve been told you’re wrong. Yet you insist on being just absofrickinglutely stupid about it. It’s wild to watch.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s wild to watch.
Its insanity.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:05 pm to Azkiger
Just know that the judge jury prosecution and defense all disagree with your imaginary situation. No one argued what you say. None of them said they knew of AA doing anything wrong when they initiated confrontation. No matter what you say there are no facts backing your defense
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
You’re still wrong. And you’ve been told you’re wrong. Yet you insist on being just absofrickinglutely stupid about it. It’s wild to watch.
Here's the law again:
"A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge. If the offense is a felony and the offender is escaping or attempting to escape,a private person may arrest him upon reasonable and probable grounds for suspicion."
If the offense was committed in your presence, why would you also need "reasonable and probable grounds for suspicion" if that offense was a felony?
This post was edited on 11/24/21 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:09 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Not good for the father and son duo, probably for the 3rd driver as well.
I don't know if he was given the opportunity, but the third guy was a fricking idiot if he refused to take a plea in return for testimony against the father/son.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:10 pm to Azkiger
quote:
A private person may arrest an offender if the offense is committed in his presence or within his immediate knowledge.
This is a sentence by itself. It means something. You don’t want to even read it, you dumb fricking count.
Posted on 11/24/21 at 2:11 pm to 3nOut
quote:
I agree with this verdict and Rittenhouse.
Agreed.
Page 11 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News