Started By
Message

re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?

Posted on 11/3/21 at 9:50 am to
Posted by Palmetto98
Where the stars are big and bright
Member since Nov 2021
2145 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 9:50 am to
Ummm no…First, Germany needed resources and the right scientists to develop an effective atom bomb/two things it lacked. Then you have to protect your nuclear factories from getting the shvt bombed out of them

Second, let’s say Germany miraculously developed an effective bomb. Now you need effective air range and clear air superiority to keep this plane from getting blown up in the sky. There’s no way in hell they were going to be able to reach the US and I don’t think the Brits and Russians were just going to sit there and let German planes fly in their air space.

Third, Russia wasn’t sitting their jerking off waiting for the Germans to attack them. Operation Barbarossa was a do or die situation. If the Germans would’ve waited any longer than they would have ran in to a much stronger and well prepared Russia which defeats the whole point in blitzkrieg.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17618 posts
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Ummm no…First, Germany needed resources and the right scientists to develop an effective atom bomb/two things it lacked. Then you have to protect your nuclear factories from getting the shvt bombed out of them


Did or did not the Germans have their heavy water production? They needed time.

Now, hypothetically, they could have loaded a bomb on a sub and taken it into NY harbor, etc., and exploded it in place.

Since we are on the hypothetic subject, had Britain fallen like it was on the brink of, where would have we landed buildup supplies for DDay?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram