- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?
Posted on 11/3/21 at 9:50 am to Spaceman Spiff
Posted on 11/3/21 at 9:50 am to Spaceman Spiff
Ummm no…First, Germany needed resources and the right scientists to develop an effective atom bomb/two things it lacked. Then you have to protect your nuclear factories from getting the shvt bombed out of them
Second, let’s say Germany miraculously developed an effective bomb. Now you need effective air range and clear air superiority to keep this plane from getting blown up in the sky. There’s no way in hell they were going to be able to reach the US and I don’t think the Brits and Russians were just going to sit there and let German planes fly in their air space.
Third, Russia wasn’t sitting their jerking off waiting for the Germans to attack them. Operation Barbarossa was a do or die situation. If the Germans would’ve waited any longer than they would have ran in to a much stronger and well prepared Russia which defeats the whole point in blitzkrieg.
Second, let’s say Germany miraculously developed an effective bomb. Now you need effective air range and clear air superiority to keep this plane from getting blown up in the sky. There’s no way in hell they were going to be able to reach the US and I don’t think the Brits and Russians were just going to sit there and let German planes fly in their air space.
Third, Russia wasn’t sitting their jerking off waiting for the Germans to attack them. Operation Barbarossa was a do or die situation. If the Germans would’ve waited any longer than they would have ran in to a much stronger and well prepared Russia which defeats the whole point in blitzkrieg.
Posted on 11/3/21 at 11:38 am to Palmetto98
quote:
Ummm no…First, Germany needed resources and the right scientists to develop an effective atom bomb/two things it lacked. Then you have to protect your nuclear factories from getting the shvt bombed out of them
Did or did not the Germans have their heavy water production? They needed time.
Now, hypothetically, they could have loaded a bomb on a sub and taken it into NY harbor, etc., and exploded it in place.
Since we are on the hypothetic subject, had Britain fallen like it was on the brink of, where would have we landed buildup supplies for DDay?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)