- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:01 pm to bdavids09
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:01 pm to bdavids09
quote:
I'm curious if Germany never attacks Russia could the US have defeated Germany when they were at full strength?
The USA island hopped across the Pacific and tore the Jap military apart limb by limb until they lost the will to fight. The Japs were a much scarier opponent than the Germans simply because their soldiers wouldn't surrender and fought to the death.
If the USA could do that, then yeah, they could have beaten the Germans with no Soviet help.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 6:22 pm to VADawg
quote:
The USA island hopped across the Pacific and tore the Jap military apart limb by limb until they lost the will to fight. The Japs were a much scarier opponent than the Germans simply because their soldiers wouldn't surrender and fought to the death.
If the USA could do that, then yeah, they could have beaten the Germans with no Soviet help.
Island hopping effectively reduced the amount of fighting we had to do. As you recall, most engagements were naval, but there was a lot of island fighting. Island campaigns lasted a month at most.
The Japs were brutal but the Germans fought smarter.
This post was edited on 11/2/21 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 11/2/21 at 8:27 pm to VADawg
quote:
The USA island hopped across the Pacific and tore the Jap military apart limb by limb until they lost the will to fight. The Japs were a much scarier opponent than the Germans simply because their soldiers wouldn't surrender and fought to the death.
If the USA could do that, then yeah, they could have beaten the Germans with no Soviet help.
If you take even the the slightest amount of time to understand the logistics required, you’d know our leaders agreed it’d be foolish to send more than 90 divisions overseas.
Assuming the USSR sits out, even if you consolidate all of our efforts on Germany, we still have nowhere near the supportable manpower needed to prevent them from possessing land superiority throughout the entire continent.
And this isn’t a slight against our armed forces. What we accomplished during WW2 is completely without pier.
But we never possessed 300 divisions. And even if we did, we never believed it would be possible to effectively supply such a force so far from home.
The Soviets saved Europe from the Nazi’s and we saved Europe from the Soviets. It’s as simple as that.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)