Started By
Message

re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?

Posted on 11/2/21 at 9:20 am to
Posted by Mstate
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2009
9751 posts
Posted on 11/2/21 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Their one mistake: switching from bombing RAF/military targets to cities. They had the RAF on the ropes and almost done for. Had that happened, England would have fallen.


That was one of Gorings many mistakes but from what I’ve read they still didn’t have the capacity to launch operation sea lion (the invasion of Britain). Not enough surface ships to defend the convoy and I don’t think they had the necessary transport or assault boats.

Now, with British fighter cover eliminated I guess they could have just fire bombed London all day and night but not sure they could have launched a full fledged invasion
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17622 posts
Posted on 11/2/21 at 10:23 am to
quote:

That was one of Gorings many mistakes but from what I’ve read they still didn’t have the capacity to launch operation sea lion (the invasion of Britain). Not enough surface ships to defend the convoy and I don’t think they had the necessary transport or assault boats.

Now, with British fighter cover eliminated I guess they could have just fire bombed London all day and night but not sure they could have launched a full fledged invasion


Exactly. The only thing after control of the air would have been the sea. At that time, Uboats ruled the seas as we weren't in it at the time.

I do believe they more than had the capability to do an invasion had they not made that critical mistake of switching targets. In all honesty, they may not have had to invade. They could have ringed the island and kept supplies out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram