Started By
Message

re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?

Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:27 pm to
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8363 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:27 pm to
I say one-on-one, Germany would beat US. They were by far more prepared, but America had the advantage of throwing their resources behind the effort as time went on.

Germany was not built for the long game and Germany couldn’t handle Russia and America at the same time.
Posted by Mstate
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2009
9724 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

say one-on-one, Germany would beat US.


Maybe. I guess if you throw a full strength SS Panzer Division with Panther and Tiger II’s (no mechanical breakdowns) up against a full strength US Armored division I may take the Germans. But their problem was most of their vehicles were constantly in the shop or left behind.

Funny how German vehicles in WW2 were known to be cutting edge with all the bells & whistles ie night vision, auto loaders, enhanced optics, powerful cannons etc yet they were extremely unreliable just like a BMW or Mercedes today
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26824 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

say one-on-one, Germany would beat US


Not sure how you could reach that conclusion. Germany had no ability to force the US to surrender at any point in the war. Even their most ambitious hypothetical plans for the Reich mostly fell short of being able to project power in the Western Hemisphere.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram