- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:09 pm to keakar
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:09 pm to keakar
quote:
germany solidifies its power and control of all of europe
Germany was never for a moment capable of invading, conquering, and successfully pacifying Britain. Thus, any hold on Europe (on top of the one it already had from Dunkirk to D-Day) would have always been tenuous and ultimately temporary. Besides, Italy was always a paper tiger and would have allowed the United States/Allies to invade the continent even without a landing in France. It would have taken longer and cost more lives, but Germany could not have won once the war went global.
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 4:11 pm
1
Posted on 11/2/21 at 12:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Germany was never for a moment capable of invading, conquering, and successfully pacifying Britain.
Had Germany adopted a policy of containment of UK power they could have waited until their nuclear program was succesful. It would have been game set match for the Brits.
Hitler's fixation on Russia is what destroyed his dreams. He had the manpower to win in Western Europe. He should have hit Africa to secure oil and waited patiently until 1947. Germany had a HUGE technological advantage that grew wider every year.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News