- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/5/21 at 8:48 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why are you so up to speed on gay stuff? Hobby?
It was one of several behavioral scenarios discussed in the book i recommended earlier. It also covers other behaviors. The "gay gene" stuff was used as an example of how people fundamentally misunderstand the actual science behind it with gross over simplifications.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 8:48 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
You do understand it's possible to be born a certain way and there not be a specific gene that controls that behavior right?
This is really stupid. It's either a choice or it's not. If they're actually born that way there will be some sort of marker.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 8:49 pm to oklahogjr
quote:by the way. If this is true then being gay or any other sexual deviation from heterosexuality should not be a protected class.
There is never going to be s gay gene found. That's not how sexuality or genetics work.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 8:50 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
You do understand it's possible to be born a certain way and there not be a specific gene that controls that behavior right
LOL
No shite. Tell us all about your Advanced genetic knowledge. Did anyone claim there was a single Gene that controlled it? Idiot
Posted on 9/5/21 at 8:52 pm to oklahogjr
Why do you read gay books? Hobby?
Posted on 9/5/21 at 9:08 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
There is never going to be s gay gene found. That's not how sexuality or genetics work
quote:
LOL idiot
Why don't you explain why you think the poster is wrong instead of just smirking on the sideline?
Posted on 9/5/21 at 9:09 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
LOL
No shite. Tell us all about your Advanced genetic knowledge. Did anyone claim there was a single Gene that controlled it? Idiot
it's all right there in the statement "the gay gene". it's not the gay Gene(s) or the gay genetic markers..... it's a singular noun that is very different from the statements information volvagia and myself have pointed to on the subject.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 9:47 pm to oklahogjr
“Behave” is the shite. I’ve listened to 15 of 30hrs and have not got to that part. It’s hard to argue that we have free will in the since that we believe we do. There is a documentary called “do I sound gay” interesting and none of them know why the talk like that, and admit that they are not attracted to other men who talk like that.
I think OP statement is reasonable, and surprised it didn’t get any down voted. I don’t think anybody wants to see dead babies, I think focusing on the end result is shortsighted. We should be concerned with what makes a woman get to the point where an abortion is the best thing, especially when a species main motivation is passing on it’s genes. Why are we so concerned with A fetus, and progressively less concerned with them as they age, basically against them as they become an older teenager. We wonder why they didn’t learn personal responsibility when their mother wanted to abort them, and don’t realize the cyclical nature of that second generation likely warning an abortion also.
Those thoughts and conversations are much harder and intricate then saying killing babies equals bad
I think OP statement is reasonable, and surprised it didn’t get any down voted. I don’t think anybody wants to see dead babies, I think focusing on the end result is shortsighted. We should be concerned with what makes a woman get to the point where an abortion is the best thing, especially when a species main motivation is passing on it’s genes. Why are we so concerned with A fetus, and progressively less concerned with them as they age, basically against them as they become an older teenager. We wonder why they didn’t learn personal responsibility when their mother wanted to abort them, and don’t realize the cyclical nature of that second generation likely warning an abortion also.
Those thoughts and conversations are much harder and intricate then saying killing babies equals bad
This post was edited on 9/5/21 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 9/5/21 at 10:30 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
No one NEEDS more than one abortion
No one NEEDS one at all, it's not like you can't have sex without an abortion!
Posted on 9/5/21 at 10:45 pm to NashvilleTider
We know.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 10:45 pm to pigskinGod
quote:
This is really stupid. It's either a choice or it's not. If they're actually born that way there will be some sort of marker.
Well in genetics there is a saying. The phenotype (what you observe) is the result of the genotype (the genetic makeup ) and the environment, and the interactions between the genotype and the environment.
I don't know of any homosexual tendencies being tied to a gene or set of genes. But, consider two girls with identical masculine tendencies but in different environments; one could "become gay" and the other not.
And the gay one could certainly "feel like" they were born gay.
Right now the environment created by the leftists is playing a huge role in the frequency of homosexuality.
It's probably part of the plan they hatched long ago.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:04 pm to NashvilleTider
Point awarded for creativity
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:09 pm to oklahogjr
quote:Leftists: They were born this way!
There is never going to be s gay gene found. That's not how sexuality or genetics work.
Also Leftists: No way it could possibly be genetic.
Wish there were an in utero genetic test for leftism.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:20 pm to NashvilleTider
Epic post. I doubt any lefty will understand it thou. Upvote
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:28 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Nah that's just how some express themselves. Definitely not always the case. Take Spencer Klavan, for example.
It’s a cultural thing. I’ve known a couple of gay people who would occasionally forget they’re with a normal crowd and slip into the voice and affectations for a sentence or two. You could watch them realise it and slip right back into a normal voice and mannerisms.
I’m not saying all gays do it, but it’s pretty common.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:44 pm to Plx1776
quote:a lot of women don’t even know that they’re pregnant at 6 weeks
6 weeks or less is plenty of time for a rape or incest victim to get tested.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:52 pm to texridder
quote:
Why don't you explain why you think the poster is wrong instead of just smirking on the sideline?
You missed the point. It doesn't matter if he was wrong or correct.
He's arguing that being gay is unrelated to biology in any way. Which completely guts the entire argument for gay being a protected group. If it's just a feeling, then protecting gays from discrimination at the Federal level is about like protecting swingers, or midget frickers, or people who prefer blondes, or people who prefer big dicks, or............well, pretty much EVERY preference you can think of.
That moron wants it BOTH ways.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:54 pm to LSUbest
quote:You literally just described basically every human personality characteristic......ever.
I don't know of any homosexual tendencies being tied to a gene or set of genes. But, consider two girls with identical masculine tendencies but in different environments; one could "become gay" and the other not.
Alas, we don't create protected groups for such things.
Posted on 9/5/21 at 11:55 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:It's downright comical.
Leftists: They were born this way!
Also Leftists: No way it could possibly be genetic.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News