Started By
Message

re: Unfrickingbelievable!!!!!!!

Posted on 9/16/08 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by Soopatigafan
Vacherie, La
Member since Jun 2008
208 posts
Posted on 9/16/08 at 5:02 pm to
EVERYBODY else
Posted by adavis
North of I-10
Member since Aug 2007
5749 posts
Posted on 9/16/08 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

it's true you whiners


59-0 against BYU?????? Maybe UCLA should try to get a few of those weak OCC games.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53802 posts
Posted on 9/16/08 at 5:46 pm to
This guy sounds like a UGA or USC student
Posted by Fighting Tigers
Member since Aug 2008
2167 posts
Posted on 9/16/08 at 7:46 pm to
That presentation was very confused.

If it just wanted to single out teams that didn't pick any OOC opponents from the big five conferences, fair enough. LSU didn't schedule any OOC opponents from the five major conferences this year like we normally do (Arizona, Arizona State, Oregon St, Virginia Tech, Washington, etc). Because LSU didn't do so for this season, yes, our OOC schedule is weak this year.

But the presentation says "These teams may all look strong, but pollsters might want to think twice before inviting them to a BCS bowl. Why? Because their schedules just aren't cutting it. Take LSU, for starters..."

That makes no sense. We play @ Auburn, @ Florida, and we play Georgia and Alabama at home. All of those teams are currently Top Ten. How do you get a schedule any stronger than that?

I also don't get how Ohio State made their list, when Ohio State's OOC includes #1 Southern Cal.

Same with Florida State, whose OOC includes #4 Florida and a Big 12 team, Colorado.

Same with South Carolina, whose OOC includes Clemson (ACC).

Same with Penn State, whose OOC includes Oregon St (Pac-10).

Same with Missouri, whose OOC includes Illinois (Big Ten).

Usually, if your OOC includes a team from one of the five major conferences, that's not too shabby.

Interesting that that presentation singled out 3 SEC teams, 3 Big 12 teams, 3 Big 10 teams, and 1 ACC team... but didn't say anything about, say Arizona (Pac-10), whose OOC schedule is Idaho, Toledo, New Mexico. How is that any better than the five above teams that at least scheduled a OOC team from another big 5 conference????

You could say Arizona is too small-time to single out for a poor OOC schedule, but then why did they single out Kentucky?

What an odd piece by Foxsports.





This post was edited on 9/16/08 at 7:50 pm
Posted by Gulf Coast Tiger
Ms Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2004
18706 posts
Posted on 9/16/08 at 10:02 pm to
The writer must be a Ohio St fan.
Posted by Summer Grove Tiger
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2008
1381 posts
Posted on 9/17/08 at 9:48 am to
What really pisses me off is, they are implying that LSU used that "formula" last year. At least, to an extent (they imply 2 losses).

In 2007, nobody played and beat more top 15 teams than LSU. LSU was 5-0 against top 15 teams last year. As a measure of comparison, USC was 0-0.

They might have something of a point in 2008, but they need to get educated about 2007.
Posted by LSU2WIN
God's country
Member since Feb 2006
296 posts
Posted on 9/17/08 at 1:32 pm to
2 things - LSU was the first picture.

It was the best picture.

I didn't even know that Fox had heard of college football.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram