- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP announces class action lawsuit against big tech
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:37 pm to cwill
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:37 pm to cwill
quote:
That is unquestionably the law.
Are you aware that political affiliation is a protected class in California? Same as race and sex. What law are you referring to when you make such a bold, yet ignorant statement such as the one above?
3
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:37 pm to Zapparocks
quote:
Private companies cannot be forced to post content that they determine to be a violation of their terms of service.
No but the following can happen:
They could be required to explicitly specify what section of the terms of service were violated.
Their enforcement of their terms of service could be subject to independent audit.
If the terms of service are not updated within a certain timeframe they could be rendered void.
This post was edited on 7/7/21 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:37 pm to Zapparocks
quote:
Trump has the option of posting on other social media sites that do not find his social media output objectionable.
I wish Chicken and the admins would just delete all of you un-American fricks who defend big tech.
It is one of my greatest wishes in the world today.
Not so we don't have to read your bullshite but to give you a taste of what you are rooting for. And to watch you cry about it and not realize it's your own doing.
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:41 pm to tgrgrd00
President Trump's legal team is arguing that congress can't get a private organization (big tech) to do something it isn't allowed to do.
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:43 pm to CaTiger85
Why did you stop posting as BBONDS25?
Posted on 7/7/21 at 4:58 pm to CaTiger85
quote:
Are you aware that political affiliation is a protected class in California? Same as race and sex. What law are you referring to when you make such a bold, yet ignorant statement such as the one above?
No, I am not. I did the most minimal research and it appears to be a workplace law...meaning employers/employees. Wouldn't apply here, but I'm open to the fact that maybe because you have Ca in you handle maybe you know something I'm missing.
Also, are you the "bedrooms of bedding" guy?
This post was edited on 7/7/21 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 7/7/21 at 5:15 pm to LeClerc
And u prove again that u are an idiot
Posted on 7/7/21 at 5:24 pm to Ham Malone
quote:
Why did you stop posting as BBONDS25
No way...
Posted on 7/7/21 at 5:27 pm to havoclax
John Coale, lawyer for DJT, was just on War Room.
Contact America First Policy Institute if you want to join class action lawsuit.
11th circuit is conservative and SCOTUS Thomas presides over it.
Contact America First Policy Institute if you want to join class action lawsuit.
11th circuit is conservative and SCOTUS Thomas presides over it.
Posted on 7/7/21 at 5:49 pm to hnds2th
LOL!! And these lawsuits will go NOWHERE.
But the hilarious part of this will be that his brainwashed and cowardly supporters, 90% that post on this board, will most probably donate to his legal fund and get ZILCH in return
But the hilarious part of this will be that his brainwashed and cowardly supporters, 90% that post on this board, will most probably donate to his legal fund and get ZILCH in return
Posted on 7/7/21 at 6:39 pm to RighteousTiger
quote:
But the hilarious part of this will be that his brainwashed and cowardly supporters, 90% that post on this board, will most probably donate to his legal fund and get ZILCH in return
And what are you getting in return for voting for biden? Higher gas prices and a loss of energy independence? More illegal immigration and a crisis at the border? Advancing of china and Russian policy and property? Promoting of CRT and indoctrination in America? Are you happy with this? Yeah, you probably are. Idiot.
Posted on 7/7/21 at 11:10 pm to cwill
quote:
Platform?
Yes, I've read the law many times. They use the term interactive computer service to describe what we call platforms.
The actual relevant portion of the law:
quote:
These services offer users a great degree of control over the information that they receive, as well as the potential for even greater control in the future as technology develops. (3) The Internet and other interactive computer services offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.
These descriptions advise us that Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are not interactive service providers , as no reasonable person would use these descriptions for those companies
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:26 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Yes, I've read the law many times. They use the term interactive computer service to describe what we call platforms.
The actual relevant portion of the law:
How long did it take you to make up that bullshite to try and cover your arse on this one?
This post was edited on 7/8/21 at 12:27 am
Posted on 7/8/21 at 1:47 am to cwill
quote:
How long did it take you to make up that bull shite to try and cover your arse on this one?
0.0
Posted on 7/8/21 at 4:18 am to tgrgrd00
quote:Well it would be satisfying, but doesn't that just take TD down a slippery slope?
I wish Chicken and the admins would just delete all of you un-American fricks who defend big tech.
It is one of my greatest wishes in the world today.
Not so we don't have to read your bullshite but to give you a taste of what you are rooting for. And to watch you cry about it and not realize it's your own doing.
And one of your "greatest" desires? C'mon, man.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 5:18 am to cwill
It is almost the identical argument, sophomore.
The 1934 Communications Act gave ATT the rights to monopoly in exchange for serving the public good.
By 1974, the consideration of the public good had obviously been abandoned by ATT. It was Nixon’s justice department that brought suit.
Special privileges and exemptions granted by the government bring special responsibilities and requirements.
You are just flat wrong.
The 1934 Communications Act gave ATT the rights to monopoly in exchange for serving the public good.
By 1974, the consideration of the public good had obviously been abandoned by ATT. It was Nixon’s justice department that brought suit.
Special privileges and exemptions granted by the government bring special responsibilities and requirements.
You are just flat wrong.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 11:51 am to CaTiger85
quote:
Are you aware that political affiliation is a protected class in California? Same as race and sex. What law are you referring to when you make such a bold, yet ignorant statement such as the one above?
Trumps' lawsuits (at least the Facebook and Twitter ones I read) do not allege equal protection violations. He only alleges First Amendment violations in that the private companies, in their capacity as state actors, violated the President's right to free speech by not letting him use their services as he sees fit.
It's pretty amusing. He even worked in a nod to the anons' penchant for calling things they don't like Pedos (as much as one can against a corporate entity) by citing to allegations of "child sexual abuse materials" being distributed on his preferred, but denied, platforms.
Posted on 7/8/21 at 12:39 pm to Patch
Posted on 7/8/21 at 1:46 pm to Whiznot
I’m old enough to remember when Olbermann used to be semi-sane.
Relying on him now is almost a litmus test for identifying troglodytes…
Relying on him now is almost a litmus test for identifying troglodytes…
Posted on 7/8/21 at 2:10 pm to Coleridge
Catiger85 is a very smart California lawyer who went to a very prestigious law school but he’s yet to tell us how political affiliation as a protected class operates for California companies outside of the employer-employee and housing context.
That’s not to mention the supremacy clause argument of whether Section 230 would trump California state law even if there was a finding Big Tech was censoring on political affiliation alone and not on the substance of individual posts relative to the terms of service.
That’s not to mention the supremacy clause argument of whether Section 230 would trump California state law even if there was a finding Big Tech was censoring on political affiliation alone and not on the substance of individual posts relative to the terms of service.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News