- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How bad of an L are “clean energy” hags and Greta apostles taking?
Posted on 2/17/21 at 6:09 pm to Redleg Guy
Posted on 2/17/21 at 6:09 pm to Redleg Guy
quote:
The equivalent right now though is a Category 5 hitting NYC and them blaming fracking why the buildings got damaged.
Not exactly as fracking has zero to do with the problems the hurricane caused in that hypothetical.
The problems at hand in Texas are absolutely related to the cold.
Now, the cold affected green energy like wind and solar more than it did other forms of electricity and had Texas had the infrastructure set up like places that receive this type of cold weather it probably wouldn’t have been affected as much.
In truth, the issue re: electricity in America has more to do with pussies being scared of the near limitless power we could receive via nuclear power, which, as the data in Texas shows, had absolutely ZERO fluctuation due to the cold where as every other version did.
We could easily have enough electricity for everyone to run every damn appliance and light year round without issue. We could make every street be lit up in neon and flashing lights. But nuclear baddddddd
This post was edited on 2/17/21 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 2/17/21 at 8:29 pm to beerJeep
quote:
In truth, the issue re: electricity in America has more to do with pussies being scared of the near limitless power we could receive via nuclear power, which, as the data in Texas shows, had absolutely ZERO fluctuation due to the cold where as every other version did.
We could easily have enough electricity for everyone to run every damn appliance and light year round without issue. We could make every street be lit up in neon and flashing lights. But nuclear baddddddd
When you're right, you're right.
To go one further, if we solve the bigger nuclear problem (fusion, which I concede may not be solvable from a technical standpoint), that effectively solves the power problem, within a generation, for all humans who will ever live. And it will only get more compact, efficient and safe as we go along.
And if, within a 40 or 50 year window from now, there is virtually unlimited, virtually free electricity for almost any demand level, anywhere on the planet, forever, then whatever will we wage wars over? Religion? Beer?
:letthatsinkin:
This post was edited on 2/17/21 at 8:30 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News