Started By
Message

re: All we want is for the 6 contested States with election fraud allegations to be...

Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by Tigers0918
Member since Feb 2020
1300 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:19 pm to
Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.

If we did what you say, you would just want another and another... The SC threw out one of the lawsuits as well.

All of them are crap with no substance.
Posted by Lincoln1
Member since Dec 2007
1509 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.

If we did what you say, you would just want another and another... The SC threw out one of the lawsuits as well.

All of them are crap with no substance.


Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69006 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.

If we did what you say, you would just want another and another... The SC threw out one of the lawsuits as well.

All of them are crap with no substance.



None of what you said has anything to do with an audit. Keep deflecting and cheating, and you end up with what happened.
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 2:29 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34523 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Many suits


Suits are not forensic audits.

No offense, but refusing to ensure that the election was fair is tantamount to guilt imho.

I’m not a fan of the “just trust us” crowd.



Posted by WhiteMandingo
Member since Jan 2016
5648 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:29 pm to
Thats not an open book audit.
If were to believe everything is good let them audit.
If the IRS wants to look at your books you dont get to say no were good its balanced nothing to see here.

Look there may not be an ounce of fraud, prove it to me and 75 million other folks and you probably wont have the fighting like you do.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53787 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

All of them are crap with no substance.


I heard the testimony of several who were given time to speak in front of about 8 people in each of these state hearings that were put together to appease the noise being made, I don't know how the process works

the sworn affidavits, I don't think were even read

believe what you want

I am no lawyer, but there is plenty of fraud to review

and find out who is behind it, requires an investigation
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19775 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.


The cases have been matters of law concerning states allowing their own election laws to be violated and corrupted. They were not about the fraud.

Voter fraud will be investigated as specific criminal cased. Those take time to investigate, document, present to a grand jury, charge, arrest and try. That's the way the system works (or fails to work as the case might be).



Yes America, there is voter fraud. These recent cases prove it.

quote:

Philly Fraud Case Expands

The U.S. Justice Department this past week charged former Democratic congressman Michael Myers with stuffing ballot boxes, bribing an elected official, falsifying records, obstructing justice and voting multiple times in federal elections in Philadelphia.

Myers was the second official charged in the scheme.

Domenick DeMuro, a Democratic ward chairman in that city, admitted in a plea deal that he had "fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear," prosecutors said.


LINK

Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12671 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:04 pm to
Lawyer on Twitter: there was fraud! We have the evidence and just filed our suit

Gets to court

Judge: so this is the fraud suit I saw you post on Twitter?

Lawyer: no not at all we have an issue with poll watchers, we’re not alleging fraud

Judge: ok cool what was the issue with the poll watches

Lawyer: well the dems didn’t let our people do what we wanted

Judge: like what?

Lawyer: they weren’t close enough to determine is the ballot counter used
Pantene or not

Judge: GTFO
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 3:05 pm
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
5652 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 3:06 pm to
Because lack of standing dumbass.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.



for bullshite lack of standing reasons
Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
8043 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Many suits have been heard by courts over the past 2 months and they have all been thrown out.

If we did what you say, you would just want another and another... The SC threw out one of the lawsuits as well.

All of them are crap with no substance.


False. Again.

Bunch of idiots on here.

Lawsuits were dismissed bc SC claimed they had no "standing".

I didnt have shite to do with evidence.
They didnt even peek at evidence.

How many times do we have to tell you intellectually challenged fricking retards this happened?
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:29 pm
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14079 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

All of them are crap with no substance.


Every state in question changed their voting laws without their legislature. Breaking the constitution.

Isn't that illegal?
Posted by Boogalie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Oct 2016
245 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 8:03 pm to
How many of the suits you refer to were taken up for evidentiary hearing? How many were denied out of hand with no hearing? I want to know the numbers here, not just your talking point, so put up or shut up.
Posted by Lucius Clay
Member since Sep 2012
3420 posts
Posted on 1/10/21 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

All of them are crap with no substance.


You are wasting your time presenting facts to this crowd...they have a conspiratorial answer to everything. Trump lost 54 court cases, with judges across the political spectrum calling the allegations "meritless," "without evidence," and having "no basis in fact or law." He won a single case, that was about a mostly inconsequential matter (from a vote tally standpoint) in PA. So he went 1-54.

Though it is fascinating to see how a significant number of people were so utterly duped by Trump. Then again, Trump goes way back as a con man...he started perfecting his craft in the early 70s in NY.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram