re: Is Cyberpunk really that Bad?

I love how MSGM reviewers will list like a dozen basic fundamental things wrong with a game that show a lack of effort on the part of a developer but will still excuse it saying they’ll fix those problems 6 months to a year later and give it a 9.5 out of 10 because “the staff worked so hard for so long”.

frick that, if you worked for 7 years on something the very least you can do is make sure the basic Tetris level shite in your game functions as intended.