re: Charles Scott or Cecil Collins

quote:

---

I happen to think yes, but I could be convinced otherwise. The only reason I chose CS vs. CC is because they seem to be similar in build, speed, running syle, etc.

---

it's not just that why i am asking. Other threads have been talking about Charles Scott being the best RB that LSU has right now. I was just trying to get it out in the open. To answer your question, Charles Scott is good, and his body of work so far is larger than Cecil, but there is no denying that the two games I saw cecil play in, there hasn't been a more exciting back besides Faulk that I can think of being better. I think if CC had more games, there would be no doubt.