Started By
Message

re: Charles Scott or Cecil Collins

Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:12 am to
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4621 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:12 am to
I realize you have to measure a running back by more than just size and 40 times, but just to compare the tangible attributes of both. Scott is bigger. Scott blocks and catches well. I am assuming Cecil was faster, but I don't really remember. They look pretty close to me. What did Cecil do that is/was so much better than Scott?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424483 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:13 am to
quote:

I am assuming Cecil was faster,

i dunno about that...he was like a 4.55 guy

scott seems to run about that fast, if not faster
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32457 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 5:34 pm to
When Cecil ran out of his shoes in Tiger Stadium he became legend. I love CS but he hasn't reached that status yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram