Started By
Message

re: Charles Scott or Cecil Collins

Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:09 am to
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78075 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:09 am to
Cecil.....they actually aren't far apart in my mind, it would be great if we actually had more than a couple of games Cecil played in to compare, but I guess you could say the same of Scott
Posted by tigermaniac22311
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2008
3093 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:11 am to
Cecil
Posted by Beaux
Down On The Bayou
Member since Sep 2005
4585 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:12 am to
CECIL COLLINS Are you really asking this question
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4621 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 11:12 am to
I realize you have to measure a running back by more than just size and 40 times, but just to compare the tangible attributes of both. Scott is bigger. Scott blocks and catches well. I am assuming Cecil was faster, but I don't really remember. They look pretty close to me. What did Cecil do that is/was so much better than Scott?
Posted by Doodle
Shreveport
Member since Feb 2007
109 posts
Posted on 8/7/08 at 2:14 pm to
Scott has not been given the chance that Collins had, therefore it is hard to pick.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram