re: A fully qualified Eddie Lacy or Christine Michael...

quote:

---

But if I had to choose: Christine Michael

---

I'm beginning to get into that camp too. I think the intangibles are better on Michael. I also think that we take Michael if we don't get Richardson, but, obviously, I could be wrong and we finish the class with two true RBs and either offer another ATH (are we still recruiting Ray Ray Armstrong?) or the kid with the unpronounceable name from Texas that plays RB but projects as a FB in college.

We're standing at 17, right now - it's not a big jump to fill out the remaining slots - Randle, Willie Jefferson (maybe - if we take a TE), Su'a Filo, McFarland or Sentimore, 2 LBs out of Jones, Mingo and Williams, that's 6 more, to 23 right there. Probably going to take a safety, it's just not clear who (Loston preferred, but who knows), and a corner, depending on who wants to come, and that gets us to 25 - room is rapidly running out for anyone not on the Top 16 wish list for the coaching staff.

Now that I analyze the numbers, maybe it is Richardson or bust, as suggested by an earlier poster, for the third RB ---