Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 4/3/24 at 11:06 pm to
Posted by ev247
Member since Nov 2022
323 posts
Posted on 4/3/24 at 11:06 pm to
Yeah I specifically asked SLI IR in January if they were anticipating a decision in April, or if April just represents the earliest possible timeframe for such a decision. They said it was their current understanding that the decision was likely in April.

After watching and rewatching the December AOGC hearing I couldn't figure out how they would reconcile their desire to see SLI's agreements with Lanxess and SLI's desire to keep those agreements confidential. Maybe they didn't reconcile those?

Hope it isn't the bigger companies lobbying for a higher royalty than SLI can survive and that they just withdrew so all companies can consolidate an application like you said. I know SLI wanted Lanxess royalty to be unique due to lower lithium grade but last I read in some official comment from Exxon, Exxon wanted one royalty for the whole state.

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19875 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:07 am to
SLI needs to do a couple of things even if they have one foot in the grave or are about to be bought.

The PR needs to call it "green lithium" because it is the cleanest and greenest method of production. Beat the green drum!!!

SLI needs to do independently audited proofs of concept because there are still many who don't really know if the process really works. The last proofs of concept were three years ago and supposedly they have been tweaking the science project ever since then. SLI show your work!

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram