Started By
Message

re: I work with a LOT of liberals

Posted on 12/20/19 at 1:07 am to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14283 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 1:07 am to
quote:

She asked me to break it down b/c she doesn’t understand it and after I did I’m fairly confident she’ll be voting Trump 2020.

Did you give her the Fox News approved version?

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83837 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 1:13 am to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.
Was he legally obligated have them testify or produce documents? I’m genuinely asking.

By now, pretty much any halfway intelligent person knows to never talk to or give cops any information if you aren’t legally obligated. There’s just absolutely no reason to do so. Especially when you know they’ll use ANYTHING they can to frick you.

I know this is slightly different, but the sentiment still stands. If he doesn’t HAVE to, any logical person wouldn’t be bothered on the slightest that he didn’t offer up any info.
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9405 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 1:28 am to
quote:

Did you give her the Fox News approved version?

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.
Hang in there little buddy. Keep carrying that torch.

He did not obstruct anything. He invoked executive privilege like EVERY OTHER PRESIDENT in the history of the country before him. The Dems could’ve challenged that privilege in court but Schiff said there wasn’t enough time to wait for a decision.

The Dems impeached the POTUS for using his constitutional privilege by calling it obstruction of congress. If they would’ve been patient and allowed the court to settle the matter, they may have won. Then the witnesses would’ve testified and had documents released.

This is a sham! And now they want to delay sending this to the Senate. But I thought Trump was a huge national security threat. He must be tried immediately. Or maybe Nancy knows this whole thing is shite.

Keep your eyes closed and keep defending the indefensible. There are a few of you left
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10446 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 2:10 am to
We both know he has executive privaledges. 99% of this board knows it. Stop trolling.
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 2:11 am to
quote:

Did you give her the Fox News approved version?

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


You poor little thing

I feel sorry for you
Posted by MSTIGER22
Jackson
Member since May 2007
689 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 3:35 am to
It’s called executive privilege you dumb frick.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20363 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 6:16 am to
Man I bet you are just one big ole pussy in real life.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30615 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 6:28 am to
It’s a long time until 2024! Seek help man. You might not make it
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
3431 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 6:45 am to
It's the most laughable hypocrisy ever that an Obama disciple would condemn any other President for withholding documents. The Obama Administration is the most corrupt in history and still owes congress tens of thousands of documents.
Posted by M. A. Ryland
silver spring, MD
Member since Dec 2005
2051 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:05 am to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


Which he is allowed to do.

If the House ever actually Impeaches him, that article will be dismissed.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54259 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:56 am to
quote:

texridder



This is your vote total:

0 - 102. In all my years on here I'm pretty sure I've never seen this before. Congratulations you dumb shite.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53053 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:56 am to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


What evidence would they be providing? Name 1 criminal act committed by our President that is cause for impeachment. Just 1, and i'll vote for the next Democrat you idiots put up for nomination.
Posted by CajunZ81
Mexico City
Member since Jun 2010
1743 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:17 am to
quote:

texridder


quote:

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.


At this point, the OP's observation isn't an isolated incident, there are tons of people on the left that are being honest with themselves and seeing everything for what it is. THAT doesn't make you look very good. You are either really dumb or outright purposely trying to mislead people (which no one is buying btw).


quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


This is comical. To say this while ignoring the fact that Schiff and Nadler rigged the rules for the impeachment hearings to where the Republicans couldn't call witnesses of their choosing is like cutting someone's brake lines on their car and then blaming them for getting into a wreck.

You people are sick
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9145 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Did you give her the Fox News approved version?

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


So what? You act as if this is the first time in presidential history that a president has told or "instructed" his closest advisers not to testify after Congress has called on them to testify.

Trump simply did what many presidents have done in the past which is claiming executive privilege in the matter.

There's a very clear and well established precedent followed by the legislative branch when they disagree with the validity of an executive privilege claim by a president. They challenge the claim in the courts and the courts either uphold or deny the executive privilege claim. If Trump's executive privilege claim had been contested in the courts by the legislative branch and Trump had lost and THEN he instructed his advisers not to testify or turn over the requested documents then he would be guilty of obstruction of Congress or possibly even obstruction of justice.


The fact that you and so many of your fellow Democrats can't grasp this basic point is quite frankly a bit scary. You guys are either clueless about how the constitution and rule of law works in this country or you do know how constitutional rights like a president's right to claim executive privilege works and you simply don't like it and pretend like it doesn't exist when a Republican president exercise such rights.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:26 am to
quote:

she will think when she finds out the truth


What truth?

Do you not know the authorization and privileges provided to POTUS, esp when dealing with foreign powers...

The house doesn't...are you buying what they sell?

Legally he is 100% within his right to say whatever he wants to anyone outside the US.
He can yell FIRE in foreign movie theaters, that's how broad that power is written.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12924 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.


Yea. The truth. Solid verifiable truths such as a drug addict son who knocks up strippers being a business genius who can sit on boards of companies. Companies in which he has zero experience in.

Truths like said drug addict son who knocks up strippers getting a huge cash infusion from the Chinese because of his business genius. All the while on the same trip with the Vice President. Oh and he also didn’t tell Biden anything about it. Not a single mention on a very long trip back from China.

Yep. Solid truths.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
12128 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.



There was no need. Schiff and Comey have repeatedly asserted that they had the evidence/proof of corruption and collusion. Three years of swearing they had the evidence that Trump is a clear and present danger to the country and Constitution. Its imminent, according to Pelosi. Yet she cares so little that she refuses to share that evidence with the Senate or the citizenry.

Bet you call the police and report it, every time you speed or run a stop sign.
Posted by bayourougebengal
Member since Mar 2008
7194 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Did you give her the Fox News approved version?

Imagine what she will think when she finds out the truth.

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.


I 100% knew you were a Texan by reading this, before I looked at your name. fricking cucks
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28067 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents.

Its called separation of powers, dipshitt. See what would happen if Shitt for brains demanded the Supremes turn over for their conference notes in regards to a pending decision.

1/2 of 1/3 of the Constitutionally established powers in this country has ZERO power over the others. ZERO!
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27296 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

And that Trump instructed witnesses not to testify or produce documents


Is that supposed to be a negative?


That’s what we all should do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram