- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dershowitz on Hannity just now
Posted on 12/13/19 at 8:34 pm to BamaFan365
Posted on 12/13/19 at 8:34 pm to BamaFan365
quote:I was shocked when he said it, but I might have misheard(alcohol impaired) could have played a part. But he was adamant the obstruction of congress was total BS.
thought he said that the Supreme Court was taking it up
3
Posted on 12/13/19 at 8:37 pm to Oddibe
I edited above but will add again that the point of it going that far is that two branches agree that the conflict should be settled in the Judiciary branch which is contrary to what Dims in Judiciary said.
Posted on 12/13/19 at 8:38 pm to Oddibe
Yep, he did say that with SCOTUS taking it up that it blew up the obstruction article and that it should be withdrawn
This post was edited on 12/13/19 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 12/14/19 at 8:56 am to Oddibe
quote:
But he was adamant the obstruction of congress was total BS.
As well he should be. It’s not a real thing.
If obstruction of Congress is an impeachable offense, then we’d need to go back and retroactively impeach every president who ever exercised a legislative veto. Because that’s the very definition of “obstruction of Congress”.
Oh, and incidentally, if “I’ve got a pen and a phone” isn’t “obstruction of Congress”, then literally nothing is.
This post was edited on 12/14/19 at 9:00 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News