Started By
Message

re: Is it a lie that Rispone wants to get rid of the homestead exemption????

Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:23 am to
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43704 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Barring parishes from charging businesses a local property tax on their inventory.


yes... please
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:32 am to
Yes. His plan is to turn control of the homestead exemption to your local parish. Then your parish police jury will decide whether to reduce or eliminate the exemption. They can't legally increase it above the 75K. So what would your parish do? Reducing it allows for more local taxes, but allows Rispone to say he technically didn't raise your taxes the parish did. More gimmicks, smoke and mirrors like Jindal did in office.

It's why Rispone has been so SILENT on the issue.

quote:

Rispone won’t get into details of what he wants to strike from the constitution. But while the GOP contender is scant with specifics, his allies in the business community and at the conservative think tank Pelican Institute for Public Policy have sought a constitutional convention and offered ideas, providing clues of what Rispone might want to accomplish.


quote:

Rispone’s allies have suggested: Eliminating the statewide property tax exemption for homeowners, known as the homestead exemption, letting parishes decide if they’ll maintain an exemption and its size.


LINK


Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99300 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:36 am to
Yes.

Essentially, JBE is saying because Rispone supports a constitutional CONVENTION, all of the goodies are gonna go away.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41766 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:43 am to
Well I’ll be dammed. I live in Ascension where the incoming parish president and council want to make huge improvements to infrastructure (which is needed) but I’m not confident that they would keep the homestead exemption at $75k if the state gets rid of it. They could really use that extra money right now to fund their ideas while saying they didn’t increase our taxes, the state did. And our voters here in Ascension are just dumb enough to believe that, too.

The fact that Rispone is silent on this issue worries me. And I’m a huge arse Rispone supporter. I need to do some more digging on this issue before Saturday.
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 8:44 am
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36254 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:44 am to
I followed your link and it’s not an article of what Rispone says he’s going to do, but an article of what he might do.

Pure speculation.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36254 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:47 am to
quote:


The fact that Rispone is silent on this issue worries me. And I’m a huge arse Rispone supporter. I need to do some more digging on this issue before Saturday.



It’s a red herring.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49061 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:49 am to
We should lower property taxes and get rid of the homestead exemption, everyone should pay their fair share, you know the democratic way
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
11941 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:50 am to
We should get rid of the homestead exemption.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48863 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The fact that Rispone is silent on this issue worries me.

The Homestead Exemption is terrible policy. In BR it means that most of NBR pays zero (or very little) in property taxes yet they still get to vote on what the rest of us pay. I think voting for a property tax increase should impact all property owners.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:02 am to
quote:

JBE talking point, nothing more.


.....and every other worthless, fricktarded, paid edwards crime clan shitbird troll that posts here.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36254 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:06 am to
quote:


The Homestead Exemption is terrible policy. In BR it means that most of NBR pays zero (or very little) in property taxes yet they still get to vote on what the rest of us pay. I think voting for a property tax increase should impact all property owners.



I believe there should be a small property tax levied on all property. Then an exemption could kick in, but every property owner should pay something.
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:10 am to
It's speculation because Rispone won't speak to the issue. Silence is Golden they say. He could easily today, state I will not change the homestead exemption during a constitutional convention. He hasn't and wont.

Why do you think the Sheriff's Association has endorsed JBE? Here's why below? And again, he hasn't denied it's his goal.

quote:

Rispone’s allies have suggested: Ending a constitutional requirement that the state give nearly 12,000 municipal law enforcement and firefighters $500 per month in a salary supplement beyond their local pay.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96537 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:14 am to
The sheriff’s association has been behind JBE since the last election, in part because his family was tied in with them.

That money may help matters but let’s not pretend this alliance between them is new and due to Rispone’s policies.
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:18 am to
I'd prefer seeing an elimination of all property taxes except on businesses, and move to sales/use taxes. Sales/Use taxes are more fairer, in that everyone shares in paying taxes. Those living in government housing, assisted living centers, etc. would still pay the tax with purchases made. The state property tax exemption doesn't preclude cities and towns from levying a property tax. I know because I just went to city hall last week and paid my mother's annual property tax.
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:24 am to
You make a valid point. The reason Rispone wants a constitutional convention, is he doesn't want to put forth any new changes as amendments because that requires an election thus allowing voters to decide proposed changes. Here just he and the legislature can undo what voters have already passed as amendment/protections through past elections.
Posted by Brummy
Central, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4521 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:30 am to
quote:

The reason Rispone wants a constitutional convention, is he doesn't want to put forth any new changes as amendments because that requires an election thus allowing voters to decide proposed changes. Here just he and the legislature can undo what voters have already passed as amendment/protections through past elections.

A new state constitution would still have to be ratified by the voters.
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:36 am to
That is true. But again Rispone wishes to make changes to areas that were approved by voters already as amendments to protect such areas.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96537 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:38 am to
Changes made in the 1970s, when very few voters in this state were eligible to vote (18 in 1973 would be 64 today). And the issues caused by these restraints has become very clear over the past 20+ years.

And it would still be approved by the voters to be ratified.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14519 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Question, in EBR I have seen it written that some of our property tax measures are not exempted.

How does that work?


It's embedded in that link, but the Homestead Exemption does not apply to municipal property taxes.

Not sure of the logic of that, but it is what it is.
Posted by LSUgrad1998
Member since Aug 2018
775 posts
Posted on 11/13/19 at 9:43 am to
Amendments/changes to the constitution have been on-going since the 1970's. Nearly every election year, voters are asked to approve numerous amendments to the constitution. To imply that all changes were made in the 1970's is disingenuous.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram