re: Bring back the BCS System!! Better for college football long-term

So since the inception of the CFP, the selection committee would have picked the same 4 teams that the BCS would have picked had we still had computers doing the picking. Personally, I would prefer the BCS system, as computers can't change their formula.

For those people saying it's bad because humans input the formula are dumb. Teams wouldn't change the way they played based on the formula. Which of the computer 6 polls were "biased"? What teams are they biased toward? Also, remember per the calculation, the it would kick out the highest and the lowest score, so you basically get the 4 middle computer scores as your ranking along with the Harris and the Coaches poll making up the other 2/3.

Overall, with 62 people voting in the Harris poll and making each voter records public, overall even a few biased voters wouldn't make a difference with the overall ranking.

The fact that the CFP committee can talk amongst each other is a little shady.

Final Ranking on Simulated BCS Vs. CFP Committee 2018:


Final Ranking on Simulated BCS Vs. CFP Committee 2017:


Final Ranking on Simulated BCS Vs. CFP Committee 2016:


Final Ranking on Simulated BCS Vs. CFP Committee 2015:


Final Ranking on Simulated BCS Vs. CFP Committee 2014: