Started By
Message

re: Wimbledon Final Shows Why Men Deserve To Be Paid More

Posted on 7/14/19 at 1:04 pm to
Posted by jrtplaya21
Member since Jan 2013
3167 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 1:04 pm to
So what about in Masters 1000s tournament's when it's 2 out of 3 sets for both? Should the women make less? Get off your soapbox it's not like you're seeing any of that money in your bank accounts
Posted by surftiger321
Member since Jul 2019
139 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

So what about in Masters 1000s tournament's when it's 2 out of 3 sets for both? Should the women make less? Get off your soapbox it's not like you're seeing any of that money in your bank accounts


That's a straw man argument and you know it. Yes they should get paid the same as they are both playing 2 out of 3. But how can you justify the women getting paid equal as the men in majors when women are playing 2 out of 3 and men are playing 3 out of 5? How do you justify that?

I don't mind women getting paid equal to men in terms of tournament money. Most of the men make more in endorsements and sponsorships anyway. But if women want to be paid equal at the major they need to play 3 out of 5. Simply as that.
Posted by UNO
Member since Mar 2015
4961 posts
Posted on 7/14/19 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

So what about in Masters 1000s tournament's when it's 2 out of 3 sets for both? Should the women make less?

yes
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram