- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fantasy football dynasty start up league
Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:55 am to Nonetheless
Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:55 am to Nonetheless
I am definitely interested.
Trimmed my leagues down to one last year...ready to ramp it back up to 3 or so this year
Trimmed my leagues down to one last year...ready to ramp it back up to 3 or so this year
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:48 am to Nonetheless
quote:What are you thinking for roster sizes and how many of each positions to start?
Nonetheless
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:06 am to TechDawg2007
Ppr
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
D
Flex
flex
I prefer no Kicker and two flexes but we can vote on it obviously
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
D
Flex
flex
I prefer no Kicker and two flexes but we can vote on it obviously
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:06 am to TechDawg2007
If it's a 12 team league then roster sizes need to be a minimum of 25-30 players. If 14 then 20-25. I think I would set it at 27 and 23. Also have 2 IR spots. You need space to be able to stash players and wait on development.
I'll also reiterate that I'm only really interested if this league ends up being super flex. Hope that's something y'all are interested in.
I'll also reiterate that I'm only really interested if this league ends up being super flex. Hope that's something y'all are interested in.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:08 am to Nonetheless
I would replace the D with superflex. I don't think Defenses or kickers really work with dynasty.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:09 am to Peazey
Super flex is qb as flex right?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:09 am to Peazey
I'm open to pretty much anything.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:17 am to Nonetheless
Yeah, it's a flex spot that includes being able to start qb. It's essentially 2 qb because you wouldn't want to put anything else in that slot because of how much qb's score, but it gives you week to week flexibility with injuries and byes and such.
As is in 1 qb leagues qb doesn't have very much positional value. If you have one of the one or two elites in a given year it's nice, but really any other qb1's are pretty much interchangeable. Superflex returns value to the position and makes qb's comparably as valuable as rb's.
I've just been reading a lot about it on other dynasty forums, and I think it's an interesting way to go. And my other dynasty league is 1 qb, so I'd like to vary it some.
As is in 1 qb leagues qb doesn't have very much positional value. If you have one of the one or two elites in a given year it's nice, but really any other qb1's are pretty much interchangeable. Superflex returns value to the position and makes qb's comparably as valuable as rb's.
I've just been reading a lot about it on other dynasty forums, and I think it's an interesting way to go. And my other dynasty league is 1 qb, so I'd like to vary it some.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:22 am to Nonetheless
quote:
Ppr
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
D
Flex
flex
Here's a suggestion:
QB
QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
Flex (can be QB,RB,WR,or TE)
FLEX (can be QB,RB,WR,orTE
K
no defenses
That's 10 starters and then we could have 10-13 on bench
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:25 am to TechDawg2007
I'd just do:
QB
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
F
F
SF
Edit: Yours would be 4 QB spots. You only need to add one QB spot. With four it makes QB the only position that matters and many teams wouldn't be able to even fill a legal roster week to week.
QB
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
F
F
SF
Edit: Yours would be 4 QB spots. You only need to add one QB spot. With four it makes QB the only position that matters and many teams wouldn't be able to even fill a legal roster week to week.
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 11:42 am
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:39 am to TechDawg2007
Would it be one or two super flex spots? One right?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:52 am to Nonetheless
I would be down for that.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:53 am to Peazey
Yeah 4 would be too many. 2 I'm good with for sure
Posted on 5/2/19 at 12:02 pm to Nonetheless
quote:We could do one flex and one superfklex
Would it be one or two super flex spots? One right?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:10 pm to TechDawg2007
QB
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:16 pm to 21JumpStreet
What's the argument for it being just a QB slot rather than one super flex? I think it just makes it a non trivial possibility that due to injury or bye that you aren't able to fill a legal roster one week and close to guarantees a loss. I think you should be able to fill that slot with someone in those situations.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:58 pm to Peazey
There is no argument for it but there are plenty against it
There are 32 starting QBs and if you force 2 QBs, that's 24 right there.
8 left over with 12 teams in the league. BYE weeks and people stashing QBS is going to get ugly
2 QB Leagues are reserved for 10 team leagues
Anything more should be SF, although having a SF in a 14 team league is rough
There are 32 starting QBs and if you force 2 QBs, that's 24 right there.
8 left over with 12 teams in the league. BYE weeks and people stashing QBS is going to get ugly
2 QB Leagues are reserved for 10 team leagues
Anything more should be SF, although having a SF in a 14 team league is rough
Posted on 5/2/19 at 3:01 pm to VermilionTiger
I agree with super flex.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 3:24 pm to Peazey
Yea, I guess that actually might be better .
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News