Started By
Message

re: Fantasy football dynasty start up league

Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:55 am to
Posted by Neaux Sheaux
Gods Country
Member since Apr 2016
379 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:55 am to
I am definitely interested.

Trimmed my leagues down to one last year...ready to ramp it back up to 3 or so this year
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32298 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Nonetheless
What are you thinking for roster sizes and how many of each positions to start?
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:06 am to
Ppr

Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
D
Flex
flex

I prefer no Kicker and two flexes but we can vote on it obviously
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:06 am to
If it's a 12 team league then roster sizes need to be a minimum of 25-30 players. If 14 then 20-25. I think I would set it at 27 and 23. Also have 2 IR spots. You need space to be able to stash players and wait on development.

I'll also reiterate that I'm only really interested if this league ends up being super flex. Hope that's something y'all are interested in.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:08 am to
I would replace the D with superflex. I don't think Defenses or kickers really work with dynasty.
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:09 am to
Super flex is qb as flex right?
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:09 am to
I'm open to pretty much anything.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:17 am to
Yeah, it's a flex spot that includes being able to start qb. It's essentially 2 qb because you wouldn't want to put anything else in that slot because of how much qb's score, but it gives you week to week flexibility with injuries and byes and such.

As is in 1 qb leagues qb doesn't have very much positional value. If you have one of the one or two elites in a given year it's nice, but really any other qb1's are pretty much interchangeable. Superflex returns value to the position and makes qb's comparably as valuable as rb's.

I've just been reading a lot about it on other dynasty forums, and I think it's an interesting way to go. And my other dynasty league is 1 qb, so I'd like to vary it some.
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32298 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Ppr

Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
D
Flex
flex

Here's a suggestion:
QB
QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
Flex (can be QB,RB,WR,or TE)
FLEX (can be QB,RB,WR,orTE
K

no defenses

That's 10 starters and then we could have 10-13 on bench
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:25 am to
I'd just do:

QB
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
F
F
SF

Edit: Yours would be 4 QB spots. You only need to add one QB spot. With four it makes QB the only position that matters and many teams wouldn't be able to even fill a legal roster week to week.
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 11:42 am
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:39 am to
Would it be one or two super flex spots? One right?
Posted by WhoDatTigahsTampa
S.E.LA2WestFL
Member since Oct 2013
2281 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:52 am to
I would be down for that.
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 11:53 am to
Yeah 4 would be too many. 2 I'm good with for sure
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32298 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Would it be one or two super flex spots? One right?
We could do one flex and one superfklex
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14706 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:10 pm to
QB
Qb
Rb
Rb
Wr
Wr
Te
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Flex (rb,wr,te)
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:15 pm to
You in or nah
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:16 pm to
What's the argument for it being just a QB slot rather than one super flex? I think it just makes it a non trivial possibility that due to injury or bye that you aren't able to fill a legal roster one week and close to guarantees a loss. I think you should be able to fill that slot with someone in those situations.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37864 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:58 pm to
There is no argument for it but there are plenty against it

There are 32 starting QBs and if you force 2 QBs, that's 24 right there.

8 left over with 12 teams in the league. BYE weeks and people stashing QBS is going to get ugly

2 QB Leagues are reserved for 10 team leagues

Anything more should be SF, although having a SF in a 14 team league is rough
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
33769 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 3:01 pm to
I agree with super flex.
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14706 posts
Posted on 5/2/19 at 3:24 pm to
Yea, I guess that actually might be better .
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram