- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This statement is misleading.
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:59 pm to SaintReb17
Posted on 4/26/19 at 9:59 pm to SaintReb17
Am I missing something? Is the league's own NFL.com website erroneous in listing the particulars of this trade? We give 62, 202, and next year's second for 48 and 116?
The "cost" was next year's second round pick. The "gain" was moving one pick up 14 spots and a second pick up 86 spots in this year's draft. Whether you think moving the two picks up this number of spots was or wasn't worth next year's second can certainly be argued...but that's the actual "value" each team gave in the trade. Saints gave up next year's two; Dolphins gave up a total of 100 draft order spots over two picks.
The "cost" was next year's second round pick. The "gain" was moving one pick up 14 spots and a second pick up 86 spots in this year's draft. Whether you think moving the two picks up this number of spots was or wasn't worth next year's second can certainly be argued...but that's the actual "value" each team gave in the trade. Saints gave up next year's two; Dolphins gave up a total of 100 draft order spots over two picks.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News