Started By
Message

re: Poloaris ranger vs Kawasaki mule

Posted on 2/26/19 at 10:13 am to
Posted by tigah headache
Member since Nov 2011
652 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 10:13 am to
It's bullshite that you pay $12k+ for a sxs and still have to add something to it to keep it from falling apart. The first hunting side by sides, the mule 3010, and the rhino 660 where bulletproof. Seems like they've only went downhill from there in terms of reliability.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27483 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 10:16 am to
I mean you can still buy a Viking which is just a heavily armored rhino

Better skid plates better axles better fuel pump design and a better driver position
Posted by MrSmith65
Member since Apr 2018
959 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 2:55 pm to
I still have Yamaha Rhino serial number 220, that was the first year model, 2004.

I went to the darkside in 2008, and got a Ranger, for the sheer size. It was horrible.

Then, the Vikings came out, size was I was looking for....

I have a 2015 Viking that is bulletproof. BIL has a Honda 700......it's a dog.


We have 30 members in our lease, and they have them all.


From what I see......Kawasaki Teryx has the best warranty, and the V twin is full of torque, but it's not suited to tall guys like me.

Hence, the Viking for me. It's as reliable as the '91 Honda 4 trax I have.

BUT, that Kawasaki Mule Pro FXT is a very reliable machine.

I'd NOT waste my money on any Honda side by side....and I've owned Hondas in the past, starting with an ATC 90.

They just ain't the same Honda anymore.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram