- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Haynesville Shale
Posted on 6/5/08 at 3:26 pm to TigerDog83
Posted on 6/5/08 at 3:26 pm to TigerDog83
quote:
The "tight sand" Cotton Valley wells in this area like the ones at Elm Grove generally produce at an initial rate of 1000 MCFGD to 1500 MCFGD (good ones) and then decline slowly for a long period of time (20 years or more). Some are better, and some are worse, but using Elm Grove as an example the individual wells cost 2-3 million to drill and complete. Good wells recover about 1-2 BCFG each on 20-40 acre spacing, also varying according to fields. From the limited data we have on the Haynesville, it is thought that they will cost 5-7 million to drill and will produce 10000 MCFGD or more. It is so early we don't have a good idea of decline rates or that information, but HK is already assuming 5 plus BCFG per well on 60 acre spacing. My guess is this will increase over time due to better technology and "trial and error" completion techniques. These wells also might produce for better than 30-50 years. Again, it is so early in the play we just don't know yet. But the way Chesapeake and others are moving ahead indicates that their own information that is not public indicates that this play is very, very substantial.
So you're saying 6-10 times more than Cotton Valley?
I didn't understand the $200K figure you gave earlier? Was that per well per year? Per acre per year? Per well per life???
Posted on 6/5/08 at 3:29 pm to Tiger JJ
quote:
I didn't understand the $200K figure you gave earlier? Was that per well per year? Per acre per year? Per well per life???
$200,000 is the amount of royalties (25% assumed), that you could expect per acre over the life of the well assuming a) that the gas under there is the same as the well that was on the powerpoint slide and b) a natural gas price of $12/ Mcf. It's looking like that natural gas will be a lot higher than $12 in the years to come though...
Posted on 6/5/08 at 3:30 pm to Tiger JJ
quote:
So you're saying 6-10 times more than Cotton Valley?
Could be. On the 200K of royalties per acre, that is over the entire life of all the wells in that section (could be anywhere from 20-50). Again, it is so early in this play these pieces of information are not really available yet. So, if you own 100 acres of land in the heart of the play and it turns out to be as good as advertised, you could potentially make 20 million dollars over the life of the wells in your section. If gas prices go higher as they are likely to do over the next 10 years you are going to make more than that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News