- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Haynesville Shale
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:38 pm to Tiger JJ
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:38 pm to Tiger JJ
quote:
My mom's side of the family is all from Kingston, and I believe we own some decent acreage there. I know they have had some good action in the past few years, but I really don't know that much about it. How does the Haynesville Shale impact/interfere with the Cotton Valley formation?
It really doesn't. It is a bit deeper, and my best guess is the wells will be drilled separately most likely instead of commingling the Cotton Valley due to pressure differences. The only thing would be if there are depth clauses in your original leases. If not, shallow production will hold rights, but if there are depth restrictions (pugh clauses) in the lease the deep rights probably can be leased now for a big bonus (below the current deepest producing formation). Other than that the Haynesville royalties will be in addition to the Cotton Valley. In an area with good Cotton Valley production the mineral owner will be making tremendous money with both formations producing.
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:39 pm to TigerDog83
HK Presentation 6-3-08
Click on the PDF file here. RBC Capital conference presentation from Petrohawk.
Click on the PDF file here. RBC Capital conference presentation from Petrohawk.
This post was edited on 6/5/08 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:57 pm to TigerDog83
quote:
It really doesn't. It is a bit deeper, and my best guess is the wells will be drilled separately most likely instead of commingling the Cotton Valley due to pressure differences. The only thing would be if there are depth clauses in your original leases. If not, shallow production will hold rights, but if there are depth restrictions (pugh clauses) in the lease the deep rights probably can be leased now for a big bonus (below the current deepest producing formation). Other than that the Haynesville royalties will be in addition to the Cotton Valley. In an area with good Cotton Valley production the mineral owner will be making tremendous money with both formations producing.
83, by what order of magnitude should the Haynesville wells outproduce (from a $ standpoint) the Cotton Valley wells?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News