Started By
Message

re: Haynesville Shale

Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:29 pm to
quote:


Money in the bank.....dead center in the play. Have you leased already there? There is already a good deal of production in that area from the Cotton Valley formation.


My mom's side of the family is all from Kingston, and I believe we own some decent acreage there. I know they have had some good action in the past few years, but I really don't know that much about it. How does the Haynesville Shale impact/interfere with the Cotton Valley formation?
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8346 posts
Posted on 6/5/08 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

My mom's side of the family is all from Kingston, and I believe we own some decent acreage there. I know they have had some good action in the past few years, but I really don't know that much about it. How does the Haynesville Shale impact/interfere with the Cotton Valley formation?


It really doesn't. It is a bit deeper, and my best guess is the wells will be drilled separately most likely instead of commingling the Cotton Valley due to pressure differences. The only thing would be if there are depth clauses in your original leases. If not, shallow production will hold rights, but if there are depth restrictions (pugh clauses) in the lease the deep rights probably can be leased now for a big bonus (below the current deepest producing formation). Other than that the Haynesville royalties will be in addition to the Cotton Valley. In an area with good Cotton Valley production the mineral owner will be making tremendous money with both formations producing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram