- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Avenatti Hit With More Unpaid Debt. Owes Dillanos Coffee CEO $110,000 for unpaid bills
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You are an attorney. Do you not find it odd to see someone claiming that a shareholder is liable on an obvious corporate debt?
I also own several businesses. It is not uncommon for a personal guarantee to be required by suppliers. I don’t work with suppliers that require a personal harsher, but it isn’t uncommon in the business world.
Additionally, the entitle Avenatti owns is an LLC...while an LLC is specifically non-corporate, there are cases in nearly every jurisdiction where acts of a Member that are deemed fraudulent can have the same effect as piercing the corporate veil. If avenatti intentionally misled the supplier he could be personally liable.
Again...you wan to argue semantics, because you think orange man is bad.
And defending Avenatti or even arguing semantics of who is on the hook for the bad debt he took on is very strange.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:51 pm to BBONDS25
quote:For Christ’s sake, I obviously know this. Why else would I ask whether he gave a GUARANTY?
I also own several businesses. It is not uncommon for a personal guarantee to be required by suppliers. I don’t work with suppliers that require a personal harsher, but it isn’t uncommon in the business world.
I operate my practice as a PC. I am not individually liable on debts for which I do NOT provide a guaranty.
Yes, I dislike Trump. I also dislike dishonest and half-assed reporting. I do not know whether this article has (1) affirmatively dishonest or (2) merely a half-assed excuse for reporting.
Do you honestly contend that a decent reporter would not have addressed these questions? Do you honestly contend that there is not a DISTINCT possibility that this article was written in this manner because the “source” is friendly to Trump?
For God’s sake, this Forum is absolutely infected with delusions of “false flags” against Trump, but you are willing to discount a rather obvious instance of biased reporting?
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 12:55 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News